GOODN vs. MSFT
GOODN (Gladstone Commercial Corporation) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. GOODN operates in REIT - Diversified (Real Estate), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, GOODN returned 4.14%/yr vs 6.77%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOODN vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOODN achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -26.72% return.
GOODN
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -15.19%
- YTD
- -26.72%
- 6M
- -27.38%
- 1Y
- -27.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 23.48%
GOODN vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOODN Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 1.15% | 9.52% | 17.88% | -1.72% | -6.87% | 10.15% | 3.40% | 5.93% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -26.72% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 13.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOODN and MSFT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
GOODN:
$0.60
MSFT:
$16.79
GOODN:
37.30
MSFT:
21.01
GOODN:
0.41
MSFT:
1.47
GOODN:
4.76
MSFT:
8.27
GOODN:
$165.74M
MSFT:
$318.27B
GOODN:
-$19.45M
MSFT:
$217.41B
GOODN:
$45.52M
MSFT:
$200.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOODN vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
GOODN
MSFT
GOODN vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOODN) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOODN | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.82 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | -0.81 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | -1.60 | +2.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOODN vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOODN drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOODN and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOODN | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.43% | -69.38% | +12.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -34.50% | +26.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.63% | -34.50% | +21.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.74% | -37.15% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -34.50% | +32.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -21.79% | +14.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 17.34% | -13.44% |
Volatility
GOODN vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOODN) is 3.37%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 11.82%. This indicates that GOODN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOODN | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 11.82% | -8.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.70% | 23.26% | -15.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 26.24% | -13.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 26.85% | -8.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.83% | 27.11% | +3.72% |
Dividends
GOODN vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
GOODN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than MSFT's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOODN Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 7.39% | 7.20% | 7.33% | 8.04% | 7.27% | 6.32% | 6.54% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 1.01% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
GOODN vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GOODN vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
GOODN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
GOODN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
GOODN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 6.97M and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOODN and MSFT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to GOODN (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOODN dropped -56.43% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
GOODN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOODN and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer