PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCAD vs. WAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCAD vs. WAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) and U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GCAD

1D
0.02%
1M
-3.10%
6M
5.89%
YTD
18.44%
1Y
32.06%
3Y*
31.69%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.55%

WAR

1D
0.10%
1M
-11.85%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$562.37K$467.75K$488.04K
$393.99K$600.52K$802.98K

GCAD vs. WAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GCAD and WAR is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026

0.52

GCAD vs. WAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GCAD
WAR

Industrials

85.0%
44.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Communication Services

1.1%
1.4%

Technology

1.0%
54.5%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

2.7%

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

GCAD
85.0%
WAR
44.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GCAD
7.0%
WAR

-

Basic Materials

GCAD
2.1%
WAR

-

Communication Services

GCAD
1.1%
WAR
1.4%

Technology

GCAD
1.0%
WAR
54.5%

Real Estate

GCAD
0.6%
WAR

-

Consumer Defensive

GCAD

-

WAR

-

Energy

GCAD

-

WAR

-

Financial Services

GCAD

-

WAR
2.7%

Healthcare

GCAD

-

WAR

-

Utilities

GCAD

-

WAR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCAD vs. WAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GCAD
GCAD Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GCAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCAD Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GCAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCAD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

WAR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GCAD vs. WAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) and U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCADWARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

GCAD vs. WAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCAD vs. WAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCAD drawdown since its inception was -16.14%, smaller than the maximum WAR drawdown of -25.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCAD and WAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCADWARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.14%

-25.04%

+8.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.35%

-19.88%

+15.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.03%

-10.62%

+7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

Volatility

GCAD vs. WAR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCADWARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.14%

49.86%

-28.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.85%

49.86%

-31.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

49.86%

-31.01%

GCAD vs. WAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCAD has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than WAR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCAD vs. WAR - Dividend Comparison

GCAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while WAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GCAD
Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF
1.74%2.06%4.94%3.62%
WAR
U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCAD and WAR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GCAD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GCAD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WAR.

GCAD has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for WAR.

They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and US Global. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for GCAD and 0.60% for WAR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCAD and WAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer