GOEX vs. HOOG
GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOEX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while HOOG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. GOEX is passively managed, while HOOG is actively managed. Over the past year, GOEX returned 64.25% vs -29.31% for HOOG. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOEX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.
Performance
GOEX vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOEX achieves a -5.02% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -60.40% return.
GOEX
- 1D
- -4.11%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- -5.02%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.31%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
HOOG
- 1D
- -12.13%
- 1M
- 10.59%
- YTD
- -60.40%
- 6M
- -72.73%
- 1Y
- -29.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOEX vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -5.02% | 123.72% |
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | -60.40% | 291.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOEX and HOOG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOEX vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank
GOEX
HOOG
GOEX vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOEX | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.07 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | -0.34 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | -0.55 | +5.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOEX | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | -0.22 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.31 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
GOEX vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOEX drawdown since its inception was -88.83%, roughly equal to the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOEX and HOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOEX | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.83% | -86.94% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.78% | -86.94% | +54.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.90% | -81.53% | +51.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.59% | -37.56% | -26.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.04% | 53.22% | -40.18% |
Volatility
GOEX vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) is 14.62%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 41.51%. This indicates that GOEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOEX | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.62% | 41.51% | -26.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.87% | 100.64% | -60.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.13% | 137.15% | -88.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.00% | 144.88% | -105.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.97% | 144.88% | -104.91% |
GOEX vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOEX vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison
GOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than HOOG's 31.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.19% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | 31.07% | 12.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOEX and HOOG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOG has higher volatility (41.51%) compared to GOEX (14.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOEX dropped -88.83% vs HOOG's -86.94%.
On 1-year performance, GOEX leads with 64.25% vs -29.31% for HOOG. On fees, GOEX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GOEX has been the lower-risk option at 14.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 64.25% return vs -29.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOEX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HOOG.
HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.07%, compared with 2.19% for GOEX.
GOEX is categorized as Materials, while HOOG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GOEX and 0.75% for HOOG.
GOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOEX and HOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer