GNXIX vs. FGIAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GNXIX (AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund) and FGIAX (Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - GNXIX is a Global Equities fund managed by AlphaCentric Funds, while FGIAX is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. Over the past 5 years, GNXIX returned -1.86%/yr vs 9.59%/yr for FGIAX. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GNXIX charges 1.40%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for FGIAX.

Performance

GNXIX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund (GNXIX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNXIX achieves a -17.91% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 11.78% return.

GNXIX

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: -14.10%
• 6M: -21.65%
• YTD: -17.91%
• 1Y: -8.11%
• 3Y*: 7.34%
• 5Y*: -1.86%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.94%

FGIAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.91%
• 6M: 7.25%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 1Y: 15.52%
• 3Y*: 14.42%
• 5Y*: 9.59%
• 10Y*: 8.24%
• ALL TIME*: 6.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GNXIX AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GNXIX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GNXIX AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund	-17.91%	22.71%	24.96%	7.21%	-32.53%	5.95%	40.26%	27.85%	-18.74%	20.66%
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	11.78%	17.73%	10.70%	8.51%	-6.23%	14.51%	-2.76%	29.32%	-7.91%	3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between GNXIX and FGIAX is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2017	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between GNXIX and FGIAX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GNXIX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GNXIX

GNXIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
GNXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
GNXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GNXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GNXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
GNXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FGIAX

FGIAX Risk / Return Rank: 58
FGIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FGIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FGIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FGIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FGIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GNXIX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund (GNXIX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GNXIX	FGIAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	1.50	-1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	2.12	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.27	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	2.65	-2.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.61	8.18	-8.79

GNXIX vs. FGIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNXIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the FGIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNXIX and FGIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GNXIX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNXIX drawdown since its inception was -46.17%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNXIX and FGIAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GNXIX	FGIAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.17%	-49.35%	+3.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.83%	-6.04%	-30.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.83%	-9.68%	-27.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.91%	-21.08%	-24.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.45%	-2.72%	-29.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.26%	-7.13%	-10.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.00%	1.95%	+14.05%

Volatility

GNXIX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison

AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund (GNXIX) has a higher volatility of 12.35% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 3.16%. This indicates that GNXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GNXIX	FGIAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.35%	3.16%	+9.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.57%	9.06%	+22.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.09%	10.69%	+30.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.50%	13.24%	+15.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.80%	15.16%	+9.64%

GNXIX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNXIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

GNXIX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison

GNXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than FGIAX's 14.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	14.27%	9.99%	7.46%	2.27%	6.11%	7.20%	1.38%	7.06%	6.32%	5.83%	8.23%	3.05%
GNXIX AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund	1.45%	1.19%	0.00%	0.00%	5.18%	4.23%	0.00%	0.00%	3.38%	1.85%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GNXIX and FGIAX in my portfolio?

GNXIX and FGIAX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GNXIX or FGIAX?

GNXIX has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to FGIAX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNXIX dropped -46.17% vs FGIAX's -49.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.