QLTI vs. KEMX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GMO International Quality ETF (QLTI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX).

QLTI and KEMX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QLTI is an actively managed fund by GMO. It was launched on Oct 28, 2024. KEMX is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2019.

Performance

QLTI vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO International Quality ETF (QLTI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QLTI vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QLTI GMO International Quality ETF	-6.11%	17.12%	-8.17%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	9.35%	38.28%	-6.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLTI achieves a -6.11% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 9.35% return.

QLTI

• 1D: 2.52%
• 1M: -10.97%
• YTD: -6.11%
• 6M: -2.13%
• 1Y: 6.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEMX

• 1D: 4.34%
• 1M: -11.07%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 6M: 21.09%
• 1Y: 50.32%
• 3Y*: 20.32%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLTI vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLTI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

QLTI

GMO International Quality ETF

KEMX

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF

Return for Risk

QLTI vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLTI

QLTI Risk / Return Rank: 22
QLTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
QLTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
QLTI Omega Ratio Rank: 21
QLTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
QLTI Martin Ratio Rank: 22

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLTI vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO International Quality ETF (QLTI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLTI	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	2.36	-1.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	3.00	-2.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.44	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	3.25	-2.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.54	13.60	-12.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLTI vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLTI and KEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLTI	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39	2.36	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.50	-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between QLTI and KEMX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QLTI vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

QLTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than KEMX's 3.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QLTI GMO International Quality ETF	0.55%	0.52%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	3.00%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%

Drawdowns

QLTI vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLTI drawdown since its inception was -14.82%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTI and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLTI	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.82%	-38.80%	+23.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.72%	-15.36%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.25%	-11.68%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-9.02%	+5.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.73%	3.67%	+0.06%

Volatility

QLTI vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO International Quality ETF (QLTI) is 6.67%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that QLTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLTI	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.67%	12.58%	-5.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.80%	16.96%	-6.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.83%	21.39%	-4.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	17.55%	-1.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.23%	20.61%	-4.38%