DRES vs. FLDZ
DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) and FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRES charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FLDZ.
Performance
DRES vs. FLDZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRES achieves a 19.39% return, which is significantly higher than FLDZ's 4.53% return.
DRES
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 19.39%
- 6M
- 19.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLDZ
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 4.21%
- 1Y
- 9.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRES vs. FLDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 19.39% | 2.65% |
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF | 4.53% | -1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRES and FLDZ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRES vs. FLDZ — Risk / Return Rank
DRES
FLDZ
DRES vs. FLDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRES | FLDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.96 | 0.34 | +1.62 |
Drawdowns
DRES vs. FLDZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRES drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum FLDZ drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRES and FLDZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRES | FLDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -19.54% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -1.52% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -5.99% | +3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.05% | — |
Volatility
DRES vs. FLDZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRES | FLDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.42% | 11.31% | +7.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 16.92% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 16.92% | +1.50% |
DRES vs. FLDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRES has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDZ's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRES vs. FLDZ - Dividend Comparison
DRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than FLDZ's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF | 1.47% | 1.54% | 1.17% | 1.39% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRES and FLDZ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRES is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRES is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for FLDZ.
FLDZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.31% for DRES.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRES and 0.77% for FLDZ.
Find the right allocation for DRES and FLDZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer