DRES vs. FLDZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) and FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRES charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FLDZ.

Performance

DRES vs. FLDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRES achieves a 20.16% return, which is significantly higher than FLDZ's 2.75% return.

DRES

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -1.03%
• 6M: 12.70%
• YTD: 20.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLDZ

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -3.99%
• 6M: -0.40%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 1Y: 3.75%
• 3Y*: 10.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRES vs. FLDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	20.16%	2.50%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	2.75%	-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DRES and FLDZ is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

DRES vs. FLDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLDZ

FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 16
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRES vs. FLDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRES	FLDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.53	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.06	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.60	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.79	—

Drawdowns

DRES vs. FLDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRES drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum FLDZ drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRES and FLDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRES	FLDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.41%	-19.54%	+9.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.25%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.75%	-5.45%	+2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-5.86%	+3.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRES	FLDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.30%	11.79%	+6.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.30%	16.84%	+1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.30%	16.84%	+1.46%

DRES vs. FLDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRES has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDZ's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRES vs. FLDZ - Dividend Comparison

DRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than FLDZ's 1.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	0.53%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	1.50%	1.54%	1.17%	1.39%	1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRES and FLDZ in my portfolio?

DRES and FLDZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRES or FLDZ?

On fees, DRES is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRES or FLDZ?

DRES is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRES or FLDZ?

FLDZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.53% for DRES.

What is the main difference between DRES and FLDZ?

They also come from different issuers: GMO and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRES and 0.77% for FLDZ.