PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRES vs. INVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRES vs. INVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRES achieves a 20.00% return, which is significantly higher than INVG's 0.68% return.


DRES

1D
0.51%
1M
2.10%
YTD
20.00%
6M
18.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INVG

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.73%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRES vs. INVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRES and INVG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRES vs. INVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRES vs. INVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRESINVGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.00

1.23

+0.77

Drawdowns

DRES vs. INVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRES drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, which is greater than INVG's maximum drawdown of -3.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRES and INVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRESINVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.41%

-3.15%

-7.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.88%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-0.71%

-1.61%

Volatility

DRES vs. INVG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRESINVGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

4.42%

+13.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.37%

4.42%

+13.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

4.42%

+13.95%

DRES vs. INVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRES has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than INVG's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRES vs. INVG - Dividend Comparison

DRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than INVG's 4.68% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


DRES and INVG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INVG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INVG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRES.

INVG has the higher dividend yield at 4.68%, compared with 0.30% for DRES.

DRES is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while INVG is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRES and 0.25% for INVG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRES and INVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer