PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMHZX vs. GCOZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMHZX vs. GCOZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMHZX achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than GCOZX's 8.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GMHZX having a 8.90% annualized return and GCOZX not far ahead at 9.05%.


GMHZX

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.40%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.89%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
8.90%

GCOZX

1D
-0.61%
1M
3.12%
YTD
8.58%
6M
8.88%
1Y
19.58%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
9.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMHZX vs. GCOZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMHZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund
7.39%15.50%11.48%15.82%-16.48%13.07%12.91%22.18%-6.84%18.55%
GCOZX
GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund
8.58%16.13%12.05%16.57%-18.06%11.60%12.96%22.39%-7.50%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GMHZX and GCOZX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.99

The correlation between GMHZX and GCOZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMHZX vs. GCOZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMHZX
GMHZX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GMHZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMHZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMHZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GMHZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMHZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOZX
GCOZX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GCOZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMHZX vs. GCOZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMHZXGCOZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.49

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

10.98

+0.99

GMHZX vs. GCOZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMHZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the GCOZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMHZX and GCOZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMHZXGCOZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.01

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.56

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.71

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.44

-0.07

Drawdowns

GMHZX vs. GCOZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMHZX drawdown since its inception was -56.35%, which is greater than GCOZX's maximum drawdown of -47.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMHZX and GCOZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMHZXGCOZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.35%

-47.79%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-8.07%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.04%

-12.39%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.86%

-25.19%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.98%

-27.50%

+0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.61%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-6.52%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.83%

-0.25%

Volatility

GMHZX vs. GCOZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) is 2.76%, while GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that GMHZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMHZXGCOZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

3.11%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

8.05%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.68%

10.00%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.14%

12.01%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.22%

12.71%

-0.49%

GMHZX vs. GCOZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMHZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOZX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMHZX vs. GCOZX - Dividend Comparison

GMHZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, less than GCOZX's 8.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCOZX
GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund
8.83%9.59%3.47%3.37%9.49%6.85%4.94%9.42%4.24%4.71%5.71%19.06%
GMHZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund
5.27%5.66%7.10%3.67%7.20%5.38%3.08%3.40%7.27%3.86%0.87%19.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GMHZX and GCOZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GCOZX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to GMHZX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMHZX dropped -56.35% vs GCOZX's -47.79%.

GMHZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMHZX and GCOZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer