PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMHZX vs. VTTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMHZX vs. VTTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMHZX achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than VTTHX's 9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, GMHZX has underperformed VTTHX with an annualized return of 8.96%, while VTTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.78% annualized return.


GMHZX

1D
0.23%
1M
3.71%
YTD
7.98%
6M
8.57%
1Y
19.46%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
8.96%

VTTHX

1D
0.30%
1M
4.00%
YTD
9.13%
6M
9.79%
1Y
21.88%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMHZX vs. VTTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMHZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund
7.98%15.50%11.48%15.82%-16.48%13.07%12.91%22.18%-6.84%18.55%
VTTHX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund
9.13%17.55%11.56%17.37%-16.64%12.96%14.80%22.44%-6.57%16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GMHZX and VTTHX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.98

The correlation between GMHZX and VTTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMHZX vs. VTTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMHZX
GMHZX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GMHZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMHZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMHZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GMHZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMHZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VTTHX
VTTHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VTTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMHZX vs. VTTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMHZXVTTHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

2.49

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.24

3.52

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.47

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.09

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.45

13.62

-1.17

GMHZX vs. VTTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMHZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the VTTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMHZX and VTTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMHZXVTTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.49

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.70

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.79

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.54

-0.17

Drawdowns

GMHZX vs. VTTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMHZX drawdown since its inception was -56.35%, which is greater than VTTHX's maximum drawdown of -51.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMHZX and VTTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMHZXVTTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.35%

-51.76%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-7.17%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.04%

-10.87%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.86%

-23.53%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.98%

-27.15%

+0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-6.09%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.62%

-0.05%

Volatility

GMHZX vs. VTTHX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX) have volatilities of 2.72% and 2.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMHZXVTTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

2.79%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

7.17%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.66%

8.89%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

11.38%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.22%

12.46%

-0.24%

GMHZX vs. VTTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMHZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VTTHX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMHZX vs. VTTHX - Dividend Comparison

GMHZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than VTTHX's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMHZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund
5.24%5.66%7.10%3.67%7.20%5.38%3.08%3.40%7.27%3.86%0.87%19.84%
VTTHX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund
2.71%2.96%3.12%2.47%2.71%19.52%2.50%2.33%2.69%0.16%2.77%4.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GMHZX and VTTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTTHX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to GMHZX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMHZX dropped -56.35% vs VTTHX's -51.76%.

VTTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMHZX and VTTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer