PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMFZX vs. GCOZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMFZX vs. GCOZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMFZX achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than GCOZX's 8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GMFZX has outperformed GCOZX with an annualized return of 10.85%, while GCOZX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.01% annualized return.


GMFZX

1D
0.70%
1M
0.91%
6M
7.68%
YTD
9.98%
1Y
19.52%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
10.85%

GCOZX

1D
0.69%
1M
0.90%
6M
6.66%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
16.59%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
9.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMFZX vs. GCOZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMFZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund
9.98%18.22%14.21%18.70%-17.40%16.30%13.82%24.26%-7.79%20.91%
GCOZX
GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund
8.73%16.13%12.05%16.57%-18.06%11.60%12.96%22.39%-7.50%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GMFZX and GCOZX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.99

The correlation between GMFZX and GCOZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMFZX vs. GCOZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMFZX
GMFZX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GMFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GMFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOZX
GCOZX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GCOZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMFZX vs. GCOZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMFZXGCOZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.99

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

8.52

+1.17

GMFZX vs. GCOZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMFZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the GCOZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMFZX and GCOZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMFZX vs. GCOZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMFZX drawdown since its inception was -60.03%, which is greater than GCOZX's maximum drawdown of -47.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMFZX and GCOZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMFZXGCOZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.03%

-47.79%

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-8.07%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.13%

-12.39%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-25.19%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.18%

-27.50%

-2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.48%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-6.50%

-3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.88%

+0.09%

Volatility

GMFZX vs. GCOZX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) have volatilities of 4.01% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMFZXGCOZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.93%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

9.06%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

10.77%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.66%

12.15%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.31%

12.65%

+1.66%

GMFZX vs. GCOZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMFZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOZX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMFZX vs. GCOZX - Dividend Comparison

GMFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than GCOZX's 8.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCOZX
GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund
8.82%9.59%3.47%3.37%9.49%6.85%4.94%9.42%4.24%4.71%5.71%19.06%
GMFZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund
4.09%4.50%5.87%3.27%6.81%5.46%2.36%3.33%7.99%4.37%3.97%19.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GMFZX and GCOZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GMFZX has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to GCOZX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMFZX dropped -60.03% vs GCOZX's -47.79%.

GMFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMFZX and GCOZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer