PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMED vs. NVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GMED vs. NVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMED achieves a -10.54% return, which is significantly lower than NVT's 58.14% return.


GMED

1D
1.92%
1M
-2.99%
6M
-17.32%
YTD
-10.54%
1Y
36.75%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
-0.63%
10Y*
12.07%

NVT

1D
1.69%
1M
-2.31%
6M
53.03%
YTD
58.14%
1Y
116.38%
3Y*
47.35%
5Y*
40.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMED vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GMED
Globus Medical, Inc.
-10.54%5.56%55.21%-28.25%2.87%10.70%10.77%36.04%-15.45%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
58.14%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%17.24%7.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GMED and NVT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018

0.38

The correlation between GMED and NVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GMED:

$10.53B

NVT:

$25.99B

EPS

GMED:

$4.28

NVT:

$2.99

PE Ratio

GMED:

18.23

NVT:

53.67

PEG Ratio

GMED:

0.19

NVT:

1.29

PS Ratio

GMED:

3.45

NVT:

6.10

PB Ratio

GMED:

2.28

NVT:

6.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

GMED:

$3.10B

NVT:

$4.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GMED:

$1.58B

NVT:

$1.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

GMED:

$803.34M

NVT:

$857.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMED vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMED
GMED Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMED Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMED Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMED vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMEDNVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.41

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

6.74

-5.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.87

20.34

-16.47

GMED vs. NVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMED Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the NVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMED and NVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMED vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMED drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum NVT drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMED and NVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMEDNVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.91%

-56.18%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.10%

-17.46%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.40%

-46.67%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.91%

-46.67%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.32%

-12.81%

-6.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.33%

-11.80%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.13%

5.77%

+3.36%

Volatility

GMED vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) is 13.69%, while nVent Electric plc (NVT) has a volatility of 17.61%. This indicates that GMED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMEDNVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.69%

17.61%

-3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.33%

33.72%

-8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.46%

43.68%

+5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.27%

36.58%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.68%

38.71%

-3.03%

Dividends

GMED vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison

GMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GMED
Globus Medical, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.51%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%

Financials

GMED vs. NVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Globus Medical, Inc. and nVent Electric plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
759.85M
1.24B
(GMED) Total Revenue
(NVT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GMED vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Globus Medical, Inc. and nVent Electric plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
35.9%
Portfolio components
GMED - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 759.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 445.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

GMED - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported an operating income of 150.39M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

GMED - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a net income of 124.30M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 142.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GMED and NVT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVT has higher volatility (17.61%) compared to GMED (13.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMED dropped -47.91% vs NVT's -56.18%.

NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMED and NVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer