PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVT vs. CSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVT vs. CSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in nVent Electric plc (NVT) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVT achieves a 70.61% return, which is significantly higher than CSL's 8.27% return.


NVT

1D
1.07%
1M
9.11%
YTD
70.61%
6M
65.12%
1Y
170.38%
3Y*
57.16%
5Y*
41.68%
10Y*

CSL

1D
1.62%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
8.27%
6M
8.32%
1Y
-6.36%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
14.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVT vs. CSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NVT
nVent Electric plc
70.61%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%17.24%0.18%
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
8.27%-12.26%19.14%34.26%-4.08%60.64%-1.96%63.10%-5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NVT and CSL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2018

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between NVT and CSL has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVT:

$28.44B

CSL:

$14.15B

EPS

NVT:

$3.00

CSL:

$17.08

PE Ratio

NVT:

57.84

CSL:

20.15

PEG Ratio

NVT:

1.39

CSL:

0.52

PS Ratio

NVT:

6.58

CSL:

2.94

PB Ratio

NVT:

7.49

CSL:

8.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVT:

$4.33B

CSL:

$4.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVT:

$1.60B

CSL:

$1.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVT:

$857.60M

CSL:

$1.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVT vs. CSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CSL
CSL Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSL Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSL Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVT vs. CSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for nVent Electric plc (NVT) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVTCSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.27

-0.18

+4.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.58

-0.01

+4.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.00

+0.61

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.78

-0.26

+10.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

34.39

-0.45

+34.84

NVT vs. CSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVT Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is higher than the CSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVT and CSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVTCSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.27

-0.18

+4.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.46

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.52

+0.30

Drawdowns

NVT vs. CSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVT drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, smaller than the maximum CSL drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVT and CSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVTCSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-64.56%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.93%

-31.67%

+14.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.67%

-37.72%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.67%

-37.72%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-26.98%

+26.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.85%

-12.31%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.82%

18.57%

-13.75%

Volatility

NVT vs. CSL - Volatility Comparison

nVent Electric plc (NVT) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) have volatilities of 10.72% and 10.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVTCSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.72%

10.71%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.29%

23.88%

+7.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.23%

35.54%

+4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.84%

30.63%

+5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.35%

29.59%

+8.76%

Dividends

NVT vs. CSL - Dividend Comparison

NVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than CSL's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
1.28%1.31%1.00%1.02%1.09%0.86%1.31%1.11%1.53%1.27%1.18%1.24%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.47%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NVT vs. CSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between nVent Electric plc and Carlisle Companies Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B20222023202420252026
1.24B
1.05B
(NVT) Total Revenue
(CSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVT vs. CSL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between nVent Electric plc and Carlisle Companies Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
35.9%
0
Portfolio components
NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 445.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

CSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

CSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 180.30M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 142.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.

CSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 127.70M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVT and CSL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVT has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to CSL (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVT dropped -56.18% vs CSL's -64.56%.

NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVT and CSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer