GMCOX vs. GPSTX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GMCOX (GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund) and GPSTX (GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - GMCOX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by GuideMark, while GPSTX is a Global Equities fund managed by GuideMark. Over the past 10 years, GMCOX returned 1.15%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for GPSTX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. GMCOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GPSTX.

Performance

GMCOX vs. GPSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) and GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMCOX achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than GPSTX's 11.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GMCOX has underperformed GPSTX with an annualized return of 1.15%, while GPSTX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.01% annualized return.

GMCOX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: -0.24%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: 4.72%
• 3Y*: 3.76%
• 5Y*: -0.37%
• 10Y*: 1.15%

GPSTX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 4.67%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 12.92%
• 1Y: 29.02%
• 3Y*: 20.49%
• 5Y*: 10.26%
• 10Y*: 12.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMCOX vs. GPSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMCOX GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund	-0.24%	6.56%	1.39%	6.19%	-14.64%	-2.01%	8.13%	8.58%	-1.44%	2.81%
GPSTX GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund	11.92%	19.64%	17.49%	24.10%	-22.19%	19.33%	19.40%	25.67%	-10.35%	21.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GMCOX and GPSTX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012	-0.03

The correlation between GMCOX and GPSTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GMCOX vs. GPSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMCOX

GMCOX Risk / Return Rank: 16
GMCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
GMCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
GMCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
GMCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
GMCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

GPSTX

GPSTX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GPSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
GPSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GPSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GPSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
GPSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMCOX vs. GPSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) and GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMCOX	GPSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	2.29	-1.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	3.16	-1.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.41	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	3.00	-1.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.54	13.51	-8.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMCOX vs. GPSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMCOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the GPSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMCOX and GPSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMCOX	GPSTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	2.29	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	0.61	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.70	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.65	-0.51

Drawdowns

GMCOX vs. GPSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMCOX drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, smaller than the maximum GPSTX drawdown of -33.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMCOX and GPSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMCOX	GPSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.49%	-33.18%	+4.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.96%	-9.92%	+6.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.46%	-18.04%	+11.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.75%	-30.30%	+10.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.36%	-33.18%	+12.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.50%	0.00%	-4.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.81%	-5.66%	-2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	2.20%	-1.22%

Volatility

GMCOX vs. GPSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) is 1.39%, while GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that GMCOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMCOX	GPSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	3.68%	-2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.72%	10.28%	-7.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90%	13.10%	-9.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.94%	17.04%	-11.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.98%	17.32%	-12.34%

GMCOX vs. GPSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMCOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GPSTX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMCOX vs. GPSTX - Dividend Comparison

GMCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than GPSTX's 4.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMCOX GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund	3.54%	3.54%	3.39%	3.40%	2.27%	2.16%	3.49%	1.45%	2.38%	2.35%	2.29%	2.55%
GPSTX GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund	4.24%	4.75%	4.45%	2.00%	4.13%	2.65%	1.82%	1.11%	1.40%	12.56%	4.21%	2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMCOX and GPSTX in my portfolio?

GMCOX and GPSTX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMCOX or GPSTX?

GPSTX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to GMCOX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMCOX dropped -28.49% vs GPSTX's -33.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.