GMCOX vs. GMLVX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) and GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX).
GMCOX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001. GMLVX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 28, 2001.
Performance
GMCOX vs. GMLVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMCOX vs. GMLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMCOX GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund | -0.36% | 6.56% | 1.39% | 6.19% | -14.64% | -2.01% | 8.13% | 8.58% | -1.44% | 2.81% |
GMLVX GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund | 3.63% | 30.29% | 7.90% | 11.13% | -20.58% | -0.51% | 15.41% | 17.72% | -15.18% | 38.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMCOX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than GMLVX's 3.63% return. Over the past 10 years, GMCOX has underperformed GMLVX with an annualized return of 1.24%, while GMLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.95% annualized return.
GMCOX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- -0.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.24%
GMLVX
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -9.57%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.92%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMCOX vs. GMLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMCOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GMLVX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMCOX vs. GMLVX — Risk / Return Rank
GMCOX
GMLVX
GMCOX vs. GMLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) and GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMCOX | GMLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.79 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 2.32 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.35 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 2.21 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 9.14 | -5.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMCOX | GMLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.79 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.27 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.46 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.20 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMCOX and GMLVX is -0.13. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GMCOX vs. GMLVX - Dividend Comparison
GMCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than GMLVX's 1.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMCOX GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund | 3.54% | 3.54% | 3.39% | 3.40% | 2.27% | 2.16% | 3.49% | 1.45% | 2.38% | 2.35% | 2.29% | 2.55% |
GMLVX GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund | 1.44% | 1.50% | 3.01% | 3.46% | 17.44% | 9.65% | 0.19% | 1.76% | 15.38% | 0.71% | 0.35% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
GMCOX vs. GMLVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMCOX drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, smaller than the maximum GMLVX drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMCOX and GMLVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMCOX | GMLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.49% | -70.50% | +42.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -14.40% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.75% | -35.37% | +15.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.36% | -39.40% | +19.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -11.73% | +7.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -18.28% | +10.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 3.48% | -2.45% |
Volatility
GMCOX vs. GMLVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) is 1.59%, while GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that GMCOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMCOX | GMLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | 9.86% | -8.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 13.99% | -11.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 18.17% | -13.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 16.03% | -10.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 17.37% | -12.40% |