PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLW vs. KEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GLW vs. KEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corning Incorporated (GLW) and KeyCorp (KEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a 103.50% return, which is significantly higher than KEY's 7.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has outperformed KEY with an annualized return of 26.95%, while KEY has yielded a comparatively lower 10.03% annualized return.


GLW

1D
-10.18%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
103.50%
6M
107.26%
1Y
254.02%
3Y*
82.57%
5Y*
36.01%
10Y*
26.95%

KEY

1D
0.42%
1M
1.74%
YTD
7.52%
6M
15.23%
1Y
38.89%
3Y*
33.73%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLW vs. KEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLW
Corning Incorporated
103.50%87.76%60.64%-1.23%-11.56%5.92%27.57%-1.02%-3.28%34.63%
KEY
KeyCorp
7.52%26.22%25.34%-11.53%-21.69%45.92%-14.50%42.72%-24.61%12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GLW and KEY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987

0.34

The correlation between GLW and KEY shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLW:

$153.21B

KEY:

$23.59B

EPS

GLW:

$2.10

KEY:

$1.78

PE Ratio

GLW:

84.59

KEY:

12.25

PEG Ratio

GLW:

2.05

KEY:

0.50

PS Ratio

GLW:

9.38

KEY:

2.12

PB Ratio

GLW:

12.97

KEY:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLW:

$16.32B

KEY:

$11.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLW:

$5.93B

KEY:

$7.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

GLW:

$3.77B

KEY:

$2.51B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLW vs. KEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLW
GLW Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

KEY
KEY Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
KEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
KEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLW vs. KEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and KeyCorp (KEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLWKEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.30

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.07

2.41

+8.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.80

6.55

+30.24

GLW vs. KEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLW Sharpe Ratio is 4.61, which is higher than the KEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLW and KEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLWKEYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.61

1.78

+2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.11

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.25

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.15

+0.11

Drawdowns

GLW vs. KEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than KEY's maximum drawdown of -87.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and KEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLWKEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.02%

-87.08%

-11.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.01%

-17.76%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-32.21%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-65.23%

+30.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.80%

-65.23%

+16.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.61%

-4.38%

-10.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.52%

-32.89%

-17.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.91%

6.52%

+0.39%

Volatility

GLW vs. KEY - Volatility Comparison

Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a higher volatility of 25.67% compared to KeyCorp (KEY) at 7.36%. This indicates that GLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLWKEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.67%

7.36%

+18.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.63%

17.24%

+32.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.26%

24.12%

+31.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.49%

38.05%

-2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.70%

39.83%

-6.13%

Dividends

GLW vs. KEY - Dividend Comparison

GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than KEY's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLW
Corning Incorporated
0.63%1.28%2.36%3.68%3.38%2.58%2.44%2.75%2.38%1.94%2.22%2.63%
KEY
KeyCorp
3.77%3.97%4.78%5.69%4.54%3.24%4.51%3.51%3.82%1.88%1.81%3.83%

Financials

GLW vs. KEY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and KeyCorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20222023202420252026
4.14B
2.73B
(GLW) Total Revenue
(KEY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GLW vs. KEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Corning Incorporated and KeyCorp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
36.9%
67.4%
Portfolio components
GLW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

KEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KeyCorp reported a gross profit of 1.84B and revenue of 2.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.4%.

GLW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 639.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

KEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KeyCorp reported an operating income of 701.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

GLW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 371.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

KEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KeyCorp reported a net income of 522.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLW and KEY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLW has higher volatility (25.67%) compared to KEY (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLW dropped -99.02% vs KEY's -87.08%.

GLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.61 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLW and KEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer