GLTR vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GLTR returned 25.79% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

GLTR vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a -12.60% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.

GLTR

• 1D: -2.77%
• 1M: -8.33%
• 6M: -21.90%
• YTD: -12.60%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: 25.77%
• 5Y*: 12.74%
• 10Y*: 10.23%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 58.27%
• YTD: 44.00%
• 1Y: 124.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTR vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	-12.60%	87.25%	13.97%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.00%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GLTR and SBIT is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.20

Return for Risk

GLTR vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 22
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 27
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 18

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTR vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLTR	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	1.41	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	2.05	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.25	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	2.60	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.54	5.92	-4.38

GLTR vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTR and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLTR vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLTR	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.70%	-91.35%	+35.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.52%	-47.94%	+10.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.00%	-77.15%	+40.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.85%	-68.83%	+39.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.79%	21.04%	-4.25%

Volatility

GLTR vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 9.95%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLTR	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.95%	22.98%	-13.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.53%	68.89%	-33.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.31%	88.51%	-49.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.08%	96.89%	-72.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.76%	96.89%	-76.13%

GLTR vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLTR vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.97%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLTR and SBIT in my portfolio?

GLTR and SBIT have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLTR or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to GLTR (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, GLTR or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 25.79% for GLTR. On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GLTR has been the lower-risk option at 9.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLTR or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 25.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLTR or SBIT?

GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLTR or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.

What is the main difference between GLTR and SBIT?

GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: abrdn and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.