GLTR vs. OUNZ
GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and OUNZ (VanEck Merk Gold Trust) are both Precious Metals funds - GLTR tracks the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index while OUNZ tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLTR returned 13.17%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for OUNZ. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OUNZ.
Performance
GLTR vs. OUNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than OUNZ's 3.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLTR having a 13.17% annualized return and OUNZ not far ahead at 13.22%.
GLTR
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 53.06%
- 3Y*
- 32.36%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
OUNZ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 31.27%
- 5Y*
- 18.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
GLTR vs. OUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 1.47% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold Trust | 3.01% | 63.95% | 26.75% | 12.83% | -0.51% | -4.00% | 24.71% | 18.00% | -2.06% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and OUNZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2014 | 0.90 |
The correlation between GLTR and OUNZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. OUNZ — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
OUNZ
GLTR vs. OUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTR | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 1.69 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 4.20 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTR | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.23 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.03 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.83 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.66 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. OUNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than OUNZ's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and OUNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -21.77% | -33.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.70% | -19.14% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.70% | -19.14% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | -21.01% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | -21.76% | -7.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.86% | -17.65% | -9.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.83% | -7.57% | -21.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.88% | 7.69% | +5.19% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. OUNZ - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) at 5.52%. This indicates that GLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUNZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 5.52% | +3.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.41% | 22.98% | +12.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.58% | 26.40% | +11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 17.91% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 15.96% | +4.54% |
GLTR vs. OUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than OUNZ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLTR vs. OUNZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLTR nor OUNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, GLTR and OUNZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GLTR has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to OUNZ (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs OUNZ's -21.77%.
On 10-year performance, OUNZ leads with 13.22% vs 13.17% for GLTR. On fees, OUNZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, OUNZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, OUNZ has performed better with a 13.22% return vs 13.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUNZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.
GLTR and OUNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while OUNZ tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Merk. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.25% for OUNZ.
GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLTR and OUNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer