GLTR vs. LTRN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while LTRN (Lantern Pharma Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GLTR returned 15.32%/yr vs -25.86%/yr for LTRN. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GLTR vs. LTRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than LTRN's 12.21% return.

GLTR

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -1.45%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 10.73%
• 1Y: 53.06%
• 3Y*: 32.36%
• 5Y*: 15.32%
• 10Y*: 13.17%

LTRN

• 1D: -9.09%
• 1M: 52.47%
• YTD: 12.21%
• 6M: -3.95%
• 1Y: 5.59%
• 3Y*: -12.24%
• 5Y*: -25.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTR vs. LTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	1.47%	87.25%	20.63%	2.01%	-0.25%	-9.60%	21.80%
LTRN Lantern Pharma Inc.	12.21%	-5.02%	-25.47%	-29.14%	-24.31%	-58.55%	28.76%

Correlation

The correlation between GLTR and LTRN is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2020	0.15

Return for Risk

GLTR vs. LTRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 36
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

LTRN

LTRN Risk / Return Rank: 46
LTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
LTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
LTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
LTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTR vs. LTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLTR	LTRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	0.06	+1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	0.83	+0.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.12	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	0.07	+1.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.13	0.15	+3.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLTR vs. LTRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the LTRN Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTR and LTRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLTR	LTRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	0.06	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	-0.30	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	-0.26	+0.58

Drawdowns

GLTR vs. LTRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum LTRN drawdown of -94.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and LTRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLTR	LTRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.70%	-94.89%	+39.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.70%	-78.95%	+49.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.70%	-89.48%	+59.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.70%	-93.02%	+63.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.86%	-84.49%	+57.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.83%	-66.20%	+37.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.88%	37.12%	-24.24%

Volatility

GLTR vs. LTRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 9.13%, while Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) has a volatility of 33.75%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLTR	LTRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.13%	33.75%	-24.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.41%	89.61%	-54.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.58%	96.91%	-59.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.63%	85.34%	-61.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.50%	85.19%	-64.69%

Dividends

GLTR vs. LTRN - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLTR nor LTRN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLTR and LTRN in my portfolio?

GLTR and LTRN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLTR or LTRN?

LTRN has higher volatility (33.75%) compared to GLTR (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs LTRN's -94.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.