GLTR vs. EKG
GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and EKG (First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while EKG is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GLTR returned 32.36%/yr vs -0.66%/yr for EKG. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EKG.
Performance
GLTR vs. EKG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than EKG's -10.11% return.
GLTR
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 53.06%
- 3Y*
- 32.36%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
EKG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -10.11%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- 1Y
- -0.93%
- 3Y*
- -0.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLTR vs. EKG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 1.47% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -9.24% |
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF | -10.11% | 11.89% | 6.53% | -0.11% | -19.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and EKG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. EKG — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
EKG
GLTR vs. EKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTR | EKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.01 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | -0.04 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | -0.10 | +4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTR | EKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | -0.04 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | -0.13 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. EKG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than EKG's maximum drawdown of -43.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and EKG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | EKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -43.82% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.70% | -22.09% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.70% | -34.49% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.86% | -20.78% | -6.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.83% | -22.66% | -6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.88% | 9.73% | +3.15% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. EKG - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) at 7.09%. This indicates that GLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EKG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | EKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 7.09% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.41% | 16.42% | +18.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.58% | 21.57% | +16.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 27.07% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 27.07% | -6.57% |
GLTR vs. EKG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EKG's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLTR vs. EKG - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLTR nor EKG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTR and EKG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLTR has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to EKG (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs EKG's -43.82%.
On 3-year performance, GLTR leads with 32.36% vs -0.66% for EKG. On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EKG has been the lower-risk option at 7.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GLTR has performed better with a 32.36% return vs -0.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EKG.
GLTR and EKG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while EKG is Health & Biotech Equities. GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while EKG tracks NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.65% for EKG.
GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLTR and EKG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer