GLTR vs. DYNF
GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while DYNF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares. GLTR is passively managed, while DYNF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLTR returned 14.04%/yr vs 14.62%/yr for DYNF. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for DYNF.
Performance
GLTR vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly lower than DYNF's 9.88% return.
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -9.08%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
DYNF
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 28.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- —
GLTR vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -4.66% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 15.43% |
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 9.88% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 36.25% | -20.27% | 22.12% | 13.47% | 14.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and DYNF is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
DYNF
GLTR vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLTR | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 3.15 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 14.77 | -11.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than DYNF's maximum drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and DYNF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -34.72% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.09% | -8.67% | -25.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.09% | -18.70% | -15.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.09% | -28.65% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.27% | -2.06% | -29.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -5.96% | -22.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.86% | 1.85% | +12.01% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) at 4.91%. This indicates that GLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | 4.91% | +5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.24% | 10.37% | +25.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.40% | 13.01% | +25.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 17.58% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 19.91% | +0.73% |
GLTR vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLTR vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison
GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 0.90% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% |
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTR and DYNF have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLTR has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to DYNF (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs DYNF's -34.72%.
On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 14.62% vs 14.04% for GLTR. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 14.62% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DYNF is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.
DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.
GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while DYNF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.26% for DYNF.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLTR and DYNF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer