GLTR vs. BTC-USD
GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while BTC-USD (Bitcoin) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 10 years, GLTR returned 12.08%/yr vs 57.32%/yr for BTC-USD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLTR vs. BTC-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly higher than BTC-USD's -27.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTR has underperformed BTC-USD with an annualized return of 12.08%, while BTC-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 57.32% annualized return.
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -15.53%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 39.78%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
BTC-USD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -19.79%
- YTD
- -27.32%
- 6M
- -29.56%
- 1Y
- -39.85%
- 3Y*
- 34.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 57.32%
GLTR vs. BTC-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -4.66% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
BTC-USD Bitcoin | -27.32% | -6.27% | 120.76% | 155.82% | -64.23% | 59.40% | 304.57% | 94.10% | -73.37% | 1,324.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and BTC-USD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2012 | 0.09 |
The correlation between GLTR and BTC-USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. BTC-USD — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
BTC-USD
GLTR vs. BTC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLTR | BTC-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.87 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | -0.78 | +1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | -1.36 | +4.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. BTC-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum BTC-USD drawdown of -85.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and BTC-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | BTC-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -85.30% | +29.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.09% | -51.21% | +17.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.09% | -51.21% | +17.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.09% | -76.67% | +42.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.09% | -83.80% | +49.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.27% | -49.01% | +17.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -42.35% | +13.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.86% | 35.02% | -21.16% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. BTC-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 10.43%, while Bitcoin (BTC-USD) has a volatility of 12.11%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTC-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | BTC-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | 12.11% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.24% | 34.59% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.40% | 35.62% | +2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 44.71% | -20.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 56.62% | -35.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTR and BTC-USD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTC-USD has higher volatility (12.11%) compared to GLTR (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs BTC-USD's -85.30%.
GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLTR and BTC-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer