GLRY vs. SMOM
GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLRY is a Momentum fund actively managed by Inspire, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLRY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
GLRY vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 9.82% return.
GLRY
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 6M
- 15.71%
- 1Y
- 29.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- —
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLRY vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 17.07% | -0.50% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRY and SMOM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRY vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
GLRY
SMOM
GLRY vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRY | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRY | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.45 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
GLRY vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRY | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -7.45% | -33.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.04% | -1.48% | -14.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | — | — |
Volatility
GLRY vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRY | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.19% | 12.62% | +5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 12.62% | +7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 12.62% | +8.79% |
GLRY vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLRY vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 0.24% | 0.34% | 0.52% | 1.07% | 1.04% | 4.00% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLRY and SMOM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMOM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMOM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.
GLRY has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
GLRY is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GLRY and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for GLRY and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer