GLRY vs. PTH

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) and PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. GLRY is actively managed, while PTH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRY returned 9.14%/yr vs 2.13%/yr for PTH. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLRY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTH.

Performance

GLRY vs. PTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly lower than PTH's 18.11% return.

GLRY

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: -2.68%
• 6M: 9.91%
• YTD: 15.74%
• 1Y: 25.65%
• 3Y*: 17.50%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: —

PTH

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: 13.65%
• 6M: 20.08%
• YTD: 18.11%
• 1Y: 59.34%
• 3Y*: 14.43%
• 5Y*: 2.13%
• 10Y*: 14.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRY vs. PTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF	15.74%	16.50%	16.59%	19.58%	-22.50%	15.97%	4.64%
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	18.11%	27.91%	2.36%	-4.54%	-20.61%	-3.20%	5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRY and PTH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020	0.64

The correlation between GLRY and PTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLRY vs. PTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GLRY	PTH
Technology	27.6%	-
Industrials	24.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	-
Financial Services	10.2%	1.2%
Healthcare	8.1%	93.6%
Communication Services	6.3%	-
Utilities	3.0%	-
Real Estate	2.6%	-
Energy	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

GLRY vs. PTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRY

GLRY Risk / Return Rank: 50
GLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 45
GLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
GLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 57

PTH

PTH Risk / Return Rank: 88
PTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PTH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PTH Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRY vs. PTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLRY	PTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	2.46	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	3.26	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.39	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	4.98	-2.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.93	12.59	-4.66

GLRY vs. PTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRY Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the PTH Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRY and PTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLRY vs. PTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum PTH drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and PTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLRY	PTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.60%	-53.52%	+12.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-11.98%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.50%	-27.74%	+7.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.63%	-50.07%	+15.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.24%	-4.82%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.77%	-16.95%	+1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	4.73%	-1.49%

Volatility

GLRY vs. PTH - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a higher volatility of 8.20% compared to Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) at 7.18%. This indicates that GLRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLRY	PTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.20%	7.18%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.67%	19.19%	-2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.94%	24.33%	-4.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.27%	25.67%	-5.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.51%	27.32%	-5.81%

GLRY vs. PTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PTH's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLRY vs. PTH - Dividend Comparison

GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than PTH's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF	0.17%	0.34%	0.52%	1.07%	1.04%	4.00%
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	2.60%	3.07%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLRY and PTH in my portfolio?

GLRY and PTH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLRY or PTH?

GLRY has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to PTH (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRY dropped -40.60% vs PTH's -53.52%.

Which ETF is better, GLRY or PTH?

On 5-year performance, GLRY leads with 9.14% vs 2.13% for PTH. On fees, PTH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PTH has been the lower-risk option at 7.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLRY or PTH?

Over the 5-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 9.14% return vs 2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLRY or PTH?

PTH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLRY or PTH?

PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.17% for GLRY.

What is the main difference between GLRY and PTH?

They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GLRY and 0.60% for PTH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.