GLOF vs. POW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GLOF (iShares Global Equity Factor ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLOF is a Global Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Equity Factor Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. GLOF is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLOF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

GLOF vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLOF achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.

GLOF

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -0.95%
• 6M: 9.67%
• YTD: 12.20%
• 1Y: 23.49%
• 3Y*: 20.21%
• 5Y*: 11.82%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

POW

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -13.79%
• 6M: 25.01%
• YTD: 35.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLOF vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLOF iShares Global Equity Factor ETF	12.20%	0.74%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	35.68%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GLOF and POW is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

GLOF vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLOF

GLOF Risk / Return Rank: 68
GLOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
GLOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
GLOF Omega Ratio Rank: 65
GLOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
GLOF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLOF vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLOF	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.02	—	—

Drawdowns

GLOF vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLOF drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOF and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLOF	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.12%	-20.28%	-13.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-20.28%	+18.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.07%	-4.56%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLOF	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.43%	33.06%	-19.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.81%	33.06%	-17.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.07%	33.06%	-15.99%

GLOF vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLOF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLOF vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

GLOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLOF iShares Global Equity Factor ETF	1.59%	1.70%	2.59%	2.51%	2.53%	1.90%	1.73%	2.41%	2.03%	1.94%	1.94%	0.92%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLOF and POW in my portfolio?

GLOF and POW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLOF or POW?

On fees, GLOF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLOF or POW?

GLOF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLOF or POW?

GLOF has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between GLOF and POW?

GLOF is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GLOF and 0.75% for POW.