GLOF vs. RODM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM).
GLOF and RODM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLOF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Equity Factor Index. It was launched on Apr 28, 2005. RODM is a passively managed fund by The Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. Both GLOF and RODM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLOF or RODM.
Correlation
The correlation between GLOF and RODM is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GLOF vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLOF:
1.75
RODM:
1.04
GLOF:
2.36
RODM:
1.51
GLOF:
1.31
RODM:
1.19
GLOF:
2.39
RODM:
1.50
GLOF:
9.81
RODM:
4.23
GLOF:
2.12%
RODM:
2.65%
GLOF:
11.92%
RODM:
10.75%
GLOF:
-34.12%
RODM:
-35.98%
GLOF:
-1.97%
RODM:
-5.30%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLOF achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 0.63% return.
GLOF
1.94%
1.47%
4.16%
18.91%
9.34%
N/A
RODM
0.63%
1.34%
1.96%
10.64%
3.30%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLOF vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLOF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLOF vs. RODM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLOF
RODM
GLOF vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLOF vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
GLOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than RODM's 4.06% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLOF iShares Global Equity Factor ETF | 2.54% | 2.59% | 2.51% | 2.53% | 1.90% | 1.73% | 2.41% | 2.03% | 1.94% | 1.94% | 0.92% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 4.06% | 4.09% | 4.43% | 3.81% | 4.40% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Drawdowns
GLOF vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLOF drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOF and RODM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLOF vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.41%. This indicates that GLOF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.