GLOF vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
GLOF and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLOF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Equity Factor Index. It was launched on Apr 28, 2005. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both GLOF and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLOF or VT.
Correlation
The correlation between GLOF and VT is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GLOF vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLOF:
0.04
VT:
0.05
GLOF:
0.18
VT:
0.19
GLOF:
1.03
VT:
1.03
GLOF:
0.05
VT:
0.05
GLOF:
0.23
VT:
0.27
GLOF:
3.26%
VT:
3.21%
GLOF:
17.14%
VT:
17.34%
GLOF:
-34.12%
VT:
-50.27%
GLOF:
-11.66%
VT:
-11.90%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLOF having a -6.71% return and VT slightly lower at -7.03%.
GLOF
-6.71%
-5.63%
-7.87%
1.75%
12.09%
N/A
VT
-7.03%
-5.71%
-7.74%
2.05%
12.53%
7.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLOF vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLOF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLOF vs. VT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLOF
VT
GLOF vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLOF vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
GLOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than VT's 2.07% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLOF iShares Global Equity Factor ETF | 2.78% | 2.59% | 2.51% | 2.53% | 1.90% | 1.73% | 2.41% | 2.03% | 1.94% | 1.94% | 0.92% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 2.07% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% |
Drawdowns
GLOF vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLOF drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOF and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLOF vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 12.14% and 12.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.