GLL vs. VMRXX
GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) and VMRXX (Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares) are both funds - GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%), while VMRXX is a Money Market fund actively managed by Vanguard. GLL is passively managed, while VMRXX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLL returned -28.10%/yr vs 2.76%/yr for VMRXX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. GLL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VMRXX.
Performance
GLL vs. VMRXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a -9.94% return, which is significantly lower than VMRXX's 1.50% return.
GLL
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 19.36%
- YTD
- -9.94%
- 6M
- -15.04%
- 1Y
- -46.82%
- 3Y*
- -40.24%
- 5Y*
- -28.10%
- 10Y*
- -22.59%
VMRXX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- —
GLL vs. VMRXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | -9.94% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | 4.25% |
VMRXX Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares | 1.50% | 4.25% | 3.45% | 4.65% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLL and VMRXX is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | -0.01 |
The correlation between GLL and VMRXX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.00 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLL vs. VMRXX — Risk / Return Rank
GLL
VMRXX
GLL vs. VMRXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares (VMRXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLL | VMRXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLL | VMRXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 3.67 | -4.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.78 | 2.77 | -3.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 2.76 | -3.43 |
Drawdowns
GLL vs. VMRXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -99.24%, which is greater than VMRXX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and VMRXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLL | VMRXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.24% | 0.00% | -99.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.10% | 0.00% | -65.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.95% | 0.00% | -87.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.76% | 0.00% | -89.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.88% | 0.00% | -98.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.14% | 0.00% | -85.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.09% | 0.00% | +42.09% |
Volatility
GLL vs. VMRXX - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) has a higher volatility of 11.12% compared to Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares (VMRXX) at 0.30%. This indicates that GLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMRXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLL | VMRXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.12% | 0.30% | +10.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.04% | 0.79% | +44.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.94% | 1.12% | +51.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.05% | 1.02% | +35.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.21% | 1.02% | +31.19% |
GLL vs. VMRXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VMRXX's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLL vs. VMRXX - Dividend Comparison
GLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VMRXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMRXX Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares | 3.88% | 4.15% | 3.38% | 4.54% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLL and VMRXX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLL has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to VMRXX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLL dropped -99.24% vs VMRXX's 0.00%.
VMRXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLL and VMRXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer