GLL vs. SWRSX
GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) and SWRSX (Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund) are both funds - GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%), while SWRSX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by Charles Schwab. Over the past 10 years, GLL returned -22.08%/yr vs 2.58%/yr for SWRSX. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. GLL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SWRSX.
Performance
GLL vs. SWRSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a -5.47% return, which is significantly lower than SWRSX's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GLL has underperformed SWRSX with an annualized return of -22.08%, while SWRSX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.58% annualized return.
GLL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 21.41%
- YTD
- -5.47%
- 6M
- -6.08%
- 1Y
- -40.15%
- 3Y*
- -39.64%
- 5Y*
- -27.61%
- 10Y*
- -22.08%
SWRSX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- 2.58%
GLL vs. SWRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | -5.47% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | 1.66% | -41.47% | -26.95% | 5.39% | -23.67% |
SWRSX Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund | 1.43% | 6.84% | 1.95% | 3.80% | -12.01% | 5.83% | 10.88% | 8.38% | -1.32% | 2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLL and SWRSX is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2008 | -0.30 |
The correlation between GLL and SWRSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.39 (10 years) to -0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLL vs. SWRSX — Risk / Return Rank
GLL
SWRSX
GLL vs. SWRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLL | SWRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.29 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 2.62 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 7.90 | -8.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLL vs. SWRSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -99.24%, which is greater than SWRSX's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and SWRSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLL | SWRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.24% | -14.29% | -84.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.10% | -1.90% | -63.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.95% | -4.46% | -83.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.76% | -14.29% | -75.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.76% | -14.29% | -81.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.83% | -0.38% | -98.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.13% | -3.72% | -81.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.47% | 0.63% | +41.84% |
Volatility
GLL vs. SWRSX - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX) at 0.96%. This indicates that GLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLL | SWRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.23% | 0.96% | +14.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.29% | 2.23% | +44.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.94% | 3.20% | +50.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.34% | 6.03% | +30.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.38% | 5.37% | +27.01% |
GLL vs. SWRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SWRSX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLL vs. SWRSX - Dividend Comparison
GLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWRSX Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund | 3.79% | 4.20% | 3.68% | 3.11% | 7.95% | 4.45% | 1.33% | 2.20% | 2.87% | 1.75% | 1.81% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLL and SWRSX have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLL has higher volatility (15.23%) compared to SWRSX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLL dropped -99.24% vs SWRSX's -14.29%.
SWRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLL and SWRSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer