PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLL vs. DGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLL vs. DGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLL vs. DGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLL
ProShares UltraShort Gold
-22.83%-62.81%-33.33%-14.91%-2.12%1.66%-41.47%-26.95%5.39%-23.67%
DGP
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes
13.65%141.40%53.16%16.97%-5.54%-11.29%45.29%32.27%-7.48%24.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a -22.83% return, which is significantly lower than DGP's 13.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GLL has underperformed DGP with an annualized return of -24.50%, while DGP has yielded a comparatively higher 22.44% annualized return.


GLL

1D
-7.30%
1M
22.90%
YTD
-22.83%
6M
-39.36%
1Y
-60.18%
3Y*
-42.72%
5Y*
-32.85%
10Y*
-24.50%

DGP

1D
9.12%
1M
-22.14%
YTD
13.65%
6M
37.68%
1Y
101.12%
3Y*
63.02%
5Y*
38.30%
10Y*
22.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLL vs. DGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DGP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GLL vs. DGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLL
GLL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
GLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

DGP
DGP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLL vs. DGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLLDGPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.10

1.84

-2.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.03

2.24

-4.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.32

-0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

2.91

-3.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.39

11.14

-12.53

GLL vs. DGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLL Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the DGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLL and DGP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLLDGPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.10

1.84

-2.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.93

1.01

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.77

0.64

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.69

0.30

-1.00

Correlation

The correlation between GLL and DGP is -0.96. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

GLL vs. DGP - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLL nor DGP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GLL vs. DGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -99.24%, which is greater than DGP's maximum drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and DGP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLLDGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.24%

-75.31%

-23.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.53%

-36.58%

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.76%

-51.24%

-38.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.76%

-51.24%

-44.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.04%

-24.38%

-74.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.99%

-41.24%

-43.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.01%

9.54%

+34.47%

Volatility

GLL vs. DGP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) is 21.53%, while DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) has a volatility of 25.22%. This indicates that GLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLLDGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.53%

25.22%

-3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.40%

48.02%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.76%

55.31%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.40%

38.32%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.98%

34.93%

-2.95%