GLFOX vs. LDMIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GLFOX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares) and LDMIX (Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio) are both mutual funds - GLFOX is a Global Equities fund managed by Lazard, while LDMIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, GLFOX returned 10.06%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for LDMIX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLFOX charges 1.22%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for LDMIX.

Performance

GLFOX vs. LDMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLFOX achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than LDMIX's 34.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLFOX having a 10.06% annualized return and LDMIX not far ahead at 10.40%.

GLFOX

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -2.36%
• YTD: 7.81%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 15.88%
• 3Y*: 13.83%
• 5Y*: 11.11%
• 10Y*: 10.06%

LDMIX

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: 14.75%
• YTD: 34.39%
• 6M: 37.73%
• 1Y: 67.63%
• 3Y*: 26.08%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLFOX vs. LDMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	7.81%	23.53%	6.43%	10.59%	-1.59%	19.67%	-4.71%	21.95%	-4.06%	20.44%
LDMIX Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio	34.39%	33.67%	6.73%	9.68%	-22.61%	-10.14%	19.33%	28.17%	-20.57%	41.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GLFOX and LDMIX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010	0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between GLFOX and LDMIX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GLFOX vs. LDMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLFOX

GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 26
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

LDMIX

LDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
LDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
LDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLFOX vs. LDMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLFOX	LDMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	3.87	-2.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	4.76	-2.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.68	-0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	5.08	-3.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.50	19.25	-12.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLFOX vs. LDMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the LDMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLFOX and LDMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLFOX	LDMIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	3.87	-2.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.02	0.37	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.54	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.31	+0.51

Drawdowns

GLFOX vs. LDMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum LDMIX drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLFOX and LDMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLFOX	LDMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.65%	-51.12%	+21.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-13.14%	+4.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.07%	-19.55%	+9.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.14%	-42.66%	+25.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.65%	-46.20%	+16.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.36%	0.00%	-5.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	-19.76%	+16.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	3.47%	-0.83%

Volatility

GLFOX vs. LDMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) is 4.50%, while Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that GLFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLFOX	LDMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.50%	7.41%	-2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	14.96%	-5.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.75%	17.88%	-7.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.00%	18.12%	-7.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.34%	19.30%	-5.96%

GLFOX vs. LDMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than LDMIX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLFOX vs. LDMIX - Dividend Comparison

GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than LDMIX's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	6.07%	6.03%	4.00%	2.69%	14.50%	6.02%	2.39%	4.20%	13.99%	6.82%	2.07%	11.01%
LDMIX Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio	0.87%	1.17%	0.84%	2.24%	0.83%	1.00%	0.25%	0.54%	0.78%	0.20%	0.95%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLFOX and LDMIX in my portfolio?

GLFOX and LDMIX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLFOX or LDMIX?

LDMIX has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to GLFOX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLFOX dropped -29.65% vs LDMIX's -51.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.