LDMIX vs. CEMFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LDMIX (Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio) and CEMFX (Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, LDMIX returned 10.79%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for CEMFX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LDMIX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for CEMFX.

Performance

LDMIX vs. CEMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDMIX achieves a 36.53% return, which is significantly higher than CEMFX's 25.52% return. Over the past 10 years, LDMIX has underperformed CEMFX with an annualized return of 10.79%, while CEMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.

LDMIX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 8.58%
• YTD: 36.53%
• 6M: 38.41%
• 1Y: 68.43%
• 3Y*: 26.31%
• 5Y*: 7.89%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

CEMFX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 25.52%
• 6M: 27.02%
• 1Y: 52.45%
• 3Y*: 26.31%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: 11.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDMIX vs. CEMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LDMIX Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio	36.53%	33.67%	6.73%	9.68%	-22.61%	-10.14%	19.33%	28.17%	-20.57%	41.15%
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund	25.52%	31.39%	9.51%	26.45%	-16.15%	6.74%	8.70%	19.75%	-16.90%	29.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LDMIX and CEMFX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.83

The correlation between LDMIX and CEMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LDMIX vs. CEMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDMIX

LDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
LDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

CEMFX

CEMFX Risk / Return Rank: 89
CEMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CEMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CEMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CEMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CEMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDMIX vs. CEMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LDMIX	CEMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.46	3.12	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.14	4.04	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.57	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.22	4.25	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.85	14.77	+4.08

LDMIX vs. CEMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is comparable to the CEMFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDMIX and CEMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LDMIX vs. CEMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDMIX drawdown since its inception was -51.12%, which is greater than CEMFX's maximum drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDMIX and CEMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDMIX	CEMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.12%	-39.30%	-11.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.14%	-12.41%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.55%	-13.27%	-6.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.63%	-27.22%	-14.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.20%	-39.30%	-6.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.68%	+2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.70%	-9.57%	-10.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	3.57%	+0.07%

Volatility

LDMIX vs. CEMFX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) has a higher volatility of 9.91% compared to Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) at 6.70%. This indicates that LDMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDMIX	CEMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.91%	6.70%	+3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.36%	14.32%	+3.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.87%	16.96%	+2.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.54%	14.67%	+3.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.46%	15.20%	+4.26%

LDMIX vs. CEMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDMIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDMIX vs. CEMFX - Dividend Comparison

LDMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than CEMFX's 1.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund	1.73%	1.72%	3.31%	4.68%	1.26%	2.62%	2.13%	4.16%	2.26%	3.59%	3.65%	4.60%
LDMIX Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio	0.86%	1.17%	0.84%	2.24%	0.83%	1.00%	0.25%	0.54%	0.78%	0.20%	0.95%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDMIX and CEMFX in my portfolio?

LDMIX and CEMFX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LDMIX or CEMFX?

LDMIX has higher volatility (9.91%) compared to CEMFX (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDMIX dropped -51.12% vs CEMFX's -39.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 3.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.