PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDMIX vs. LZFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDMIX vs. LZFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) and Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDMIX achieves a 20.50% return, which is significantly higher than LZFIX's 5.14% return.


LDMIX

1D
2.79%
1M
-4.52%
6M
10.68%
YTD
20.50%
1Y
43.13%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
8.49%
ALL TIME*
6.36%

LZFIX

1D
-2.07%
1M
6.92%
6M
7.07%
YTD
5.14%
1Y
-0.37%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LDMIX vs. LZFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LDMIX
Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio
20.50%33.67%6.73%9.68%-22.61%-10.14%19.33%17.10%
LZFIX
Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio
5.14%4.09%-3.09%18.84%-5.29%22.88%1.15%9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LDMIX and LZFIX is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between LDMIX and LZFIX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDMIX vs. LZFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LDMIX
LDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

LZFIX
LZFIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
LZFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
LZFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LDMIX vs. LZFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) and Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDMIXLZFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.99

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

-0.13

+2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

-0.22

+9.16

LDMIX vs. LZFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the LZFIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDMIX and LZFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDMIX vs. LZFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDMIX drawdown since its inception was -51.12%, which is greater than LZFIX's maximum drawdown of -41.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDMIX and LZFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDMIXLZFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.12%

-41.91%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.14%

-19.87%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.55%

-21.51%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.77%

-21.69%

-16.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.75%

-7.45%

-4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-7.15%

-12.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

11.65%

-7.16%

Volatility

LDMIX vs. LZFIX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) has a higher volatility of 9.75% compared to Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX) at 7.71%. This indicates that LDMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDMIXLZFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.75%

7.71%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.41%

13.18%

+7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.57%

16.60%

+5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.07%

18.10%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

21.12%

-1.47%

LDMIX vs. LZFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDMIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LZFIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDMIX vs. LZFIX - Dividend Comparison

LDMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than LZFIX's 19.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDMIX
Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio
0.97%1.17%0.84%2.24%0.83%1.00%0.25%0.54%0.78%0.20%0.95%0.56%
LZFIX
Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio
19.85%20.87%14.95%8.68%12.81%15.59%1.12%5.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDMIX and LZFIX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LDMIX has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to LZFIX (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDMIX dropped -51.12% vs LZFIX's -41.91%.

LDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDMIX and LZFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer