GLDW vs. SPYG
GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. GLDW is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
GLDW vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDW achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return.
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 33.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
GLDW vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 1.00% | 7.63% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.75% | -0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDW and SPYG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDW vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
GLDW
SPYG
GLDW vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDW | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.35 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
GLDW vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDW | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.59% | -67.63% | +44.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.51% | -1.13% | -21.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -24.33% | +15.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.32% | — |
Volatility
GLDW vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDW | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.90% | 16.06% | +20.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 21.17% | +15.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 20.64% | +16.26% |
GLDW vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDW vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.48%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 19.48% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDW and SPYG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.48%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.
GLDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPYG is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDW and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for GLDW and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer