GLDM vs. KMB
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GLDM returned 17.41%/yr vs -0.92%/yr for KMB. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLDM vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 4.05% return.
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- —
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
GLDM vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -2.40% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.75% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | 11.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and KMB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
KMB
GLDM vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDM | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.87 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.67 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | -1.03 | +3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -24.35%, smaller than the maximum KMB drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.35% | -36.97% | +12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.35% | -29.60% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.35% | -34.06% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.35% | -34.06% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.96% | -26.52% | +4.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -8.85% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 19.43% | -10.99% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is 7.73%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that GLDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 8.42% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.93% | 16.67% | +7.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.15% | 25.77% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 20.19% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 21.07% | -4.09% |
Dividends
GLDM vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and KMB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to GLDM (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -24.35% vs KMB's -36.97%.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer