PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDG vs. RAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GLDG vs. RAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GoldMining Inc (GLDG) and FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDG achieves a -33.52% return, which is significantly lower than RAIL's -28.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GLDG has underperformed RAIL with an annualized return of -9.38%, while RAIL has yielded a comparatively higher -5.38% annualized return.


GLDG

1D
-3.52%
1M
-10.93%
6M
-47.74%
YTD
-33.52%
1Y
6.96%
3Y*
-3.64%
5Y*
-10.16%
10Y*
-9.38%
ALL TIME*
-2.22%

RAIL

1D
0.00%
1M
-11.15%
6M
-30.76%
YTD
-28.00%
1Y
-18.67%
3Y*
37.44%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
-5.38%
ALL TIME*
-3.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$491.24K$545.29K$1.48M
$1.33M$1.77M$1.96M

GLDG vs. RAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLDG
GoldMining Inc
-33.52%55.28%-17.37%-13.79%-5.83%-44.95%113.73%78.95%-45.19%-32.47%
RAIL
FreightCar America, Inc.
-28.00%23.55%231.85%-15.63%-13.28%53.11%16.43%-69.06%-60.83%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDG and RAIL is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2011

0.07

The correlation between GLDG and RAIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLDG:

$178.50M

RAIL:

$157.41M

EPS

GLDG:

-CA$0.10

RAIL:

$0.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLDG:

CA$0.00

RAIL:

$469.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLDG:

-CA$336.86K

RAIL:

$69.61M

EBITDA (TTM)

GLDG:

-CA$16.71M

RAIL:

-$1.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDG vs. RAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLDG
GLDG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RAIL
RAIL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLDG vs. RAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoldMining Inc (GLDG) and FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDGRAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.98

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

-0.43

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.25

-0.74

+0.99

GLDG vs. RAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the RAIL Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDG and RAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDG vs. RAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDG drawdown since its inception was -81.97%, smaller than the maximum RAIL drawdown of -98.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDG and RAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDGRAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.97%

-98.88%

+16.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.75%

-50.34%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.75%

-71.67%

+9.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.98%

-71.67%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.95%

-96.23%

+18.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.34%

-88.29%

+16.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.25%

-71.96%

+19.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.52%

29.31%

+5.21%

Volatility

GLDG vs. RAIL - Volatility Comparison

GoldMining Inc (GLDG) and FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) have volatilities of 14.95% and 14.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDGRAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.95%

14.69%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.49%

43.90%

+6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.26%

59.50%

+10.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.68%

67.93%

-10.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.20%

73.83%

-15.63%

Dividends

GLDG vs. RAIL - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLDG nor RAIL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDG
GoldMining Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RAIL
FreightCar America, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.58%2.41%1.85%

Financials

GLDG vs. RAIL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GoldMining Inc and FreightCar America, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDG and RAIL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDG has higher volatility (14.95%) compared to RAIL (14.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDG dropped -81.97% vs RAIL's -98.88%.

GLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDG and RAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer