GLDG vs. ASM
GLDG (GoldMining Inc) and ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — GLDG in Gold, ASM in Other Precious Metals & Mining. Over the past 10 years, GLDG returned -9.38%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for ASM. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GLDG vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDG achieves a -33.52% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's -13.62% return. Over the past 10 years, GLDG has underperformed ASM with an annualized return of -9.38%, while ASM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.19% annualized return.
GLDG
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- -10.93%
- 6M
- -47.74%
- YTD
- -33.52%
- 1Y
- 6.96%
- 3Y*
- -3.64%
- 5Y*
- -10.16%
- 10Y*
- -9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.22%
ASM
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- -18.35%
- 6M
- -40.33%
- YTD
- -13.62%
- 1Y
- 66.08%
- 3Y*
- 95.22%
- 5Y*
- 38.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.80M | $17.78M | $25.63M | |
GLDG GoldMining Inc | $491.24K | $545.29K | $1.48M |
GLDG vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDG GoldMining Inc | -33.52% | 55.28% | -17.37% | -13.79% | -5.83% | -44.95% | 113.73% | 78.95% | -45.19% | -32.47% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -13.62% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 124.14% | -4.92% | -54.48% | -2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDG and ASM is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2011 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, GLDG and ASM have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GLDG:
$178.50M
ASM:
$907.17M
GLDG:
-CA$0.10
ASM:
$0.22
GLDG:
1.10
ASM:
3.35
GLDG:
CA$0.00
ASM:
$110.70M
GLDG:
-CA$336.86K
ASM:
$59.09M
GLDG:
-CA$16.71M
ASM:
$55.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDG vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
GLDG
ASM
GLDG vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoldMining Inc (GLDG) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.19 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 1.30 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 2.33 | -2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDG vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDG drawdown since its inception was -81.97%, smaller than the maximum ASM drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDG and ASM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.97% | -94.10% | +12.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.75% | -52.81% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.75% | -52.81% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.98% | -60.20% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.95% | -90.00% | +12.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.34% | -52.27% | -19.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.25% | -63.65% | +11.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.52% | 29.32% | +5.20% |
Volatility
GLDG vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GoldMining Inc (GLDG) is 14.95%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 22.56%. This indicates that GLDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.95% | 22.56% | -7.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.49% | 63.44% | -12.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.26% | 82.98% | -12.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.68% | 66.60% | -8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.20% | 69.91% | -11.71% |
Dividends
GLDG vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
GLDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 0.68% |
GLDG GoldMining Inc | 0.00% |
Financials
GLDG vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GoldMining Inc and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDG and ASM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (22.56%) compared to GLDG (14.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDG dropped -81.97% vs ASM's -94.10%.
ASM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDG and ASM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer