GLDG vs. AG
GLDG (GoldMining Inc) and AG (First Majestic Silver Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — GLDG in Gold, AG in Silver. Over the past 10 years, GLDG returned -9.42%/yr vs -0.08%/yr for AG. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLDG vs. AG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDG achieves a -32.47% return, which is significantly lower than AG's -1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GLDG has underperformed AG with an annualized return of -9.42%, while AG has yielded a comparatively higher -0.08% annualized return.
GLDG
- 1D
- -4.35%
- 1M
- -12.14%
- 6M
- -41.38%
- YTD
- -32.47%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- -3.14%
- 5Y*
- -9.10%
- 10Y*
- -9.42%
AG
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- 6M
- -18.80%
- YTD
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- 77.29%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.39%
- 10Y*
- -0.08%
GLDG vs. AG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDG GoldMining Inc | -32.47% | 55.28% | -17.37% | -13.79% | -5.83% | -44.95% | 113.73% | 78.95% | -45.19% | -32.47% |
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | -1.44% | 204.32% | -10.47% | -25.99% | -24.73% | -17.24% | 9.62% | 108.15% | -12.61% | -11.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDG and AG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2011 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, GLDG and AG have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GLDG:
$180.64M
AG:
$8.10B
GLDG:
-CA$0.08
AG:
$0.59
GLDG:
1.05
AG:
2.83
GLDG:
CA$0.00
AG:
$1.49B
GLDG:
-CA$337.66K
AG:
$646.49M
GLDG:
-CA$13.37M
AG:
$824.25M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDG vs. AG — Risk / Return Rank
GLDG
AG
GLDG vs. AG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoldMining Inc (GLDG) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDG | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.21 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.53 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 3.20 | -2.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDG vs. AG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDG drawdown since its inception was -81.97%, smaller than the maximum AG drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDG and AG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDG | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.97% | -90.20% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.56% | -50.88% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.56% | -50.88% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.98% | -70.28% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.95% | -80.82% | +2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.89% | -48.72% | -22.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.18% | -59.11% | +6.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.45% | 24.27% | +7.18% |
Volatility
GLDG vs. AG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GoldMining Inc (GLDG) is 17.81%, while First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a volatility of 20.03%. This indicates that GLDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDG | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.81% | 20.03% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.89% | 58.34% | -4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.18% | 74.57% | -4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.91% | 62.11% | -4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.31% | 61.95% | -3.64% |
Dividends
GLDG vs. AG - Dividend Comparison
GLDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 0.22% | 0.12% | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.14% |
GLDG GoldMining Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GLDG vs. AG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GoldMining Inc and First Majestic Silver Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDG and AG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AG has higher volatility (20.03%) compared to GLDG (17.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDG dropped -81.97% vs AG's -90.20%.
AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDG and AG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer