GLDD vs. ROAD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD).

Performance

GLDD vs. ROAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLDD vs. ROAD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GLDD Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation	29.57%	16.21%	47.01%	29.08%	-62.15%	19.36%	16.24%	71.15%	33.74%
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc.	2.37%	22.71%	103.26%	63.06%	-9.25%	1.03%	72.55%	91.05%	-27.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GLDD : $1.15B ROAD : $6.23B
EPS GLDD : $1.09 ROAD : $2.19
PE Ratio GLDD : 15.60 ROAD : 50.85
PEG Ratio GLDD : 0.26 ROAD : 0.94
PS Ratio GLDD : 1.29 ROAD : 2.03
PB Ratio GLDD : 2.23 ROAD : 6.43
Total Revenue (TTM) GLDD : $888.28M ROAD : $3.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) GLDD : $203.49M ROAD : $484.02M
EBITDA (TTM) GLDD : $125.52M ROAD : $381.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDD achieves a 29.57% return, which is significantly higher than ROAD's 2.37% return.

GLDD

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 29.57%
• 6M: 41.78%
• 1Y: 95.40%
• 3Y*: 46.29%
• 5Y*: 2.53%
• 10Y*: 14.90%

ROAD

• 1D: 4.87%
• 1M: -17.30%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: -12.50%
• 1Y: 54.61%
• 3Y*: 60.37%
• 5Y*: 30.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GLDD vs. ROAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDD

GLDD Risk / Return Rank: 95
GLDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GLDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GLDD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GLDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GLDD Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ROAD

ROAD Risk / Return Rank: 76
ROAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ROAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ROAD Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ROAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ROAD Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDD vs. ROAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLDD	ROAD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	1.19	+1.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.73	1.89	+1.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.22	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.26	2.10	+4.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.29	4.55	+13.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLDD vs. ROAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDD Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the ROAD Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDD and ROAD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLDD	ROAD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	1.19	+1.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.68	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.67	-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between GLDD and ROAD is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GLDD vs. ROAD - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLDD nor ROAD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GLDD vs. ROAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDD drawdown since its inception was -80.76%, which is greater than ROAD's maximum drawdown of -54.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDD and ROAD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDD	ROAD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.76%	-54.54%	-26.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.74%	-26.55%	+11.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.32%	-54.54%	-15.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-19.99%	+19.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.17%	-16.31%	-16.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.05%	12.27%	-7.22%

Volatility

GLDD vs. ROAD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is 0.61%, while Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) has a volatility of 17.72%. This indicates that GLDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLDD	ROAD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	17.72%	-17.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.37%	31.01%	-5.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.78%	46.05%	-9.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.75%	44.24%	-2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.08%	48.43%	-5.35%

Financials

GLDD vs. ROAD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation and Construction Partners, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GLDD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported a gross profit of 53.64M and revenue of 256.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.

ROAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 121.50M and revenue of 809.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.0%.

GLDD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported an operating income of 30.34M and revenue of 256.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

ROAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.41M and revenue of 809.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

GLDD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported a net income of 12.63M and revenue of 256.45M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

ROAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 17.21M and revenue of 809.47M, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.