GLDA.DE vs. BGLD
GLDA.DE (Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)) and BGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDA.DE is a Gold fund tracking the Gold, while BGLD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest. GLDA.DE is passively managed, while BGLD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDA.DE returned 18.68%/yr vs 11.80%/yr for BGLD. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLDA.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for BGLD.
Performance
GLDA.DE vs. BGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLDA.DE is traded in EUR, while BGLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BGLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a -5.73% return, which is significantly lower than BGLD's -1.63% return.
GLDA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.94%
- YTD
- -5.73%
- 6M
- -6.84%
- 1Y
- 23.36%
- 3Y*
- 25.84%
- 5Y*
- 18.68%
- 10Y*
- —
BGLD
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -4.01%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDA.DE vs. BGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | -5.73% | 48.99% | 34.24% | 9.40% | 7.00% | 3.17% |
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | -1.63% | 17.24% | 29.84% | 9.84% | 3.62% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDA.DE and BGLD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between GLDA.DE and BGLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDA.DE vs. BGLD — Risk / Return Rank
GLDA.DE
BGLD
GLDA.DE vs. BGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDA.DE | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 1.01 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | 2.67 | +0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDA.DE vs. BGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.00%, which is greater than BGLD's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and BGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDA.DE | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.00% | -10.28% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.00% | -10.28% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -10.28% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.00% | -10.28% | -11.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.00% | -9.46% | -12.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -2.58% | -3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.94% | 3.88% | +4.06% |
Volatility
GLDA.DE vs. BGLD - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) at 3.94%. This indicates that GLDA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDA.DE | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 3.94% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.33% | 10.23% | +11.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.15% | 11.76% | +12.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 10.39% | +5.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 10.19% | +5.89% |
GLDA.DE vs. BGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLD's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDA.DE vs. BGLD - Dividend Comparison
GLDA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | 46.57% | 44.32% | 25.04% | 10.49% | 0.40% |
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDA.DE and BGLD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for BGLD.
GLDA.DE is categorized as Gold, while BGLD is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDA.DE and 0.91% for BGLD.
Find the right allocation for GLDA.DE and BGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer