GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A).

GLDA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on May 21, 2019.

Performance

GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)	9.98%	48.99%	34.24%	9.40%	7.00%	3.88%	12.92%	8.39%
BRK-A Berkshire Hathaway Inc	-3.65%	-2.30%	33.77%	12.30%	10.45%	39.26%	-6.02%	5.36%

Different Trading Currencies

GLDA.DE is traded in EUR, while BRK-A is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-A values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-A's -3.65% return.

GLDA.DE

• 1D: 2.80%
• 1M: -9.01%
• YTD: 9.98%
• 6M: 24.93%
• 1Y: 42.11%
• 3Y*: 31.11%
• 5Y*: 22.74%
• 10Y*: —

BRK-A

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: -3.65%
• 6M: -2.61%
• 1Y: -16.49%
• 3Y*: 12.97%
• 5Y*: 13.31%
• 10Y*: 12.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDA.DE

GLDA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 83
GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
GLDA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
GLDA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GLDA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
GLDA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

BRK-A

BRK-A Risk / Return Rank: 16
BRK-A Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
BRK-A Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BRK-A Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BRK-A Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
BRK-A Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLDA.DE	BRK-A	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	-0.86	+2.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	-1.08	+3.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	0.85	+0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	-0.79	+3.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.82	-1.12	+10.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the BRK-A Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDA.DE and BRK-A, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLDA.DE	BRK-A	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	-0.86	+2.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.42	0.76	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.51	+0.70

Correlation

The correlation between GLDA.DE and BRK-A is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLDA.DE nor BRK-A has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum BRK-A drawdown of -43.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and BRK-A.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDA.DE	BRK-A	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.34%	-51.47%	+33.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.53%	-14.43%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.53%	-25.98%	+9.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.01%	-11.50%	+2.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.59%	-9.51%	+3.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	8.66%	-4.30%

Volatility

GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A) at 4.42%. This indicates that GLDA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLDA.DE	BRK-A	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.22%	4.42%	+6.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.07%	11.58%	+9.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.78%	19.30%	+4.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.82%	17.55%	-1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.80%	19.71%	-3.91%