GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A
GLDA.DE (Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)) is Gold fund tracking the Gold, while BRK-A (Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class A) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GLDA.DE returned 18.65%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for BRK-A. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLDA.DE is traded in EUR, while BRK-A is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-A values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a -5.47% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-A's 4.73% return.
GLDA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- -15.18%
- YTD
- -5.47%
- 1Y
- 21.05%
- 3Y*
- 26.12%
- 5Y*
- 18.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.52%
BRK-A
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| €103.35M | €101.22M | €130.62M | |
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | €2.06M | €2.09M | €2.29M |
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | -5.47% | 48.99% | 34.24% | 9.40% | 7.00% | 3.88% | 12.92% | 6.37% |
BRK-A Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class A | 4.73% | -2.30% | 33.77% | 12.30% | 10.45% | 39.26% | -6.02% | 10.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDA.DE and BRK-A is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2019 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A — Risk / Return Rank
GLDA.DE
BRK-A
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class A (BRK-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDA.DE | BRK-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.12 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | 2.52 | -0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.55%, smaller than the maximum BRK-A drawdown of -43.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and BRK-A.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDA.DE | BRK-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.55% | -43.24% | +20.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.55% | -10.84% | -11.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.55% | -20.74% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.55% | -22.09% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.79% | -9.91% | -11.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -9.71% | +3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.74% | 4.80% | +5.94% |
Volatility
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class A (BRK-A) at 4.47%. This indicates that GLDA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDA.DE | BRK-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 4.47% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 10.75% | +7.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.75% | 14.83% | +9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 17.50% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 19.69% | -3.56% |
Dividends
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDA.DE nor BRK-A has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDA.DE and BRK-A have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GLDA.DE and BRK-A
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer