GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A
GLDA.DE (Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)) is Gold fund tracking the Gold, while BRK-A (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GLDA.DE returned 18.07%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for BRK-A. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLDA.DE is traded in EUR, while BRK-A is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-A values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a -5.48% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-A's -0.54% return.
GLDA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- 6M
- -10.91%
- YTD
- -5.48%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 26.61%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
BRK-A
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | -5.48% | 48.99% | 34.24% | 9.40% | 7.00% | 3.88% | 12.92% | 6.37% |
BRK-A Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.42% | -2.30% | 33.77% | 12.30% | 10.45% | 39.26% | -6.02% | 10.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDA.DE and BRK-A is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2019 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A — Risk / Return Rank
GLDA.DE
BRK-A
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDA.DE | BRK-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.07 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 0.47 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.41 | 1.05 | +1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.23%, smaller than the maximum BRK-A drawdown of -43.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and BRK-A.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDA.DE | BRK-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.23% | -43.24% | +21.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.23% | -10.84% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.23% | -20.74% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.23% | -22.09% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.80% | -14.44% | -7.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -9.67% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.45% | 4.86% | +4.59% |
Volatility
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A) at 3.95%. This indicates that GLDA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDA.DE | BRK-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 3.95% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.12% | 11.54% | +9.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.52% | 15.04% | +9.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 17.48% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 19.68% | -3.56% |
Dividends
GLDA.DE vs. BRK-A - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDA.DE nor BRK-A has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDA.DE and BRK-A have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GLDA.DE and BRK-A
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer