GLDA.DE vs. XDWH.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE).
GLDA.DE and XDWH.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on May 21, 2019. XDWH.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. Both GLDA.DE and XDWH.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GLDA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLDA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | 9.98% | 48.99% | 34.24% | 9.40% | 7.00% | 3.88% | 12.92% | 8.39% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.47% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 12.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -2.47% return.
GLDA.DE
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- 9.98%
- 6M
- 24.93%
- 1Y
- 42.11%
- 3Y*
- 31.11%
- 5Y*
- 22.74%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- 5.35%
- 1Y
- -1.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.78%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GLDA.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GLDA.DE
XDWH.DE
GLDA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDA.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | -0.08 | +1.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 0.01 | +2.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.00 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 0.01 | +2.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.82 | 0.01 | +9.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDA.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | -0.08 | +1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.42 | 0.43 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.56 | +0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDA.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GLDA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDA.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLDA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDA.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -26.08% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -13.28% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | -21.12% | +4.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.01% | -8.97% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -4.72% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.36% | 5.71% | -1.35% |
Volatility
GLDA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.04%. This indicates that GLDA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLDA.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.22% | 4.04% | +7.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.07% | 9.29% | +11.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.78% | 16.42% | +7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 13.28% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 14.71% | +1.09% |