GLDA.DE vs. GLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD).
GLDA.DE and GLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on May 21, 2019. GLD is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM. It was launched on Nov 18, 2004. Both GLDA.DE and GLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GLDA.DE vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLDA.DE vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | 6.99% | 48.99% | 34.24% | 9.40% | 7.00% | 3.88% | 12.92% | 8.39% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 10.30% | 44.25% | 35.02% | 9.31% | 5.38% | 3.02% | 14.53% | 8.43% |
Different Trading Currencies
GLDA.DE is traded in EUR, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLDA.DE having a 6.99% return and GLD slightly lower at 6.95%.
GLDA.DE
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -9.44%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 22.37%
- 1Y
- 38.62%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 22.07%
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.82%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 35.47%
- 3Y*
- 28.77%
- 5Y*
- 21.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDA.DE vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLDA.DE vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
GLDA.DE
GLD
GLDA.DE vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDA.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 1.39 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 1.82 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.20 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 7.62 | +1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDA.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.39 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.38 | 1.30 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.66 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDA.DE and GLD is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLDA.DE vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDA.DE nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLDA.DE vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -37.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and GLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDA.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -45.56% | +27.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -19.21% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | -21.03% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.48% | -13.23% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -16.17% | +10.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 5.20% | -0.85% |
Volatility
GLDA.DE vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.91% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 10.34%. This indicates that GLDA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLDA.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.91% | 10.34% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.91% | 23.12% | -2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.66% | 25.61% | -1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 16.43% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 14.79% | +0.98% |