GLDA.DE vs. AMZN
GLDA.DE (Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GLDA.DE returned 19.57%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for AMZN. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLDA.DE vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLDA.DE is traded in EUR, while AMZN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMZN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's 9.62% return.
GLDA.DE
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 27.74%
- 5Y*
- 19.57%
- 10Y*
- —
AMZN
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -7.44%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 19.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 21.04%
GLDA.DE vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | 2.15% | 48.99% | 34.24% | 9.40% | 7.00% | 3.88% | 12.92% | 8.39% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 9.62% | -7.28% | 53.92% | 75.46% | -46.49% | 10.03% | 61.73% | -7.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDA.DE and AMZN is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2019 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDA.DE vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank
GLDA.DE
AMZN
GLDA.DE vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDA.DE | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.13 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 0.80 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 1.95 | +2.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDA.DE | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 0.63 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 0.29 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.70 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
GLDA.DE vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -60.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and AMZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDA.DE | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -60.20% | +41.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -24.04% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -37.68% | +21.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | -52.70% | +36.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.49% | -8.69% | -6.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -12.38% | +6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.47% | 9.84% | -3.37% |
Volatility
GLDA.DE vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) is 5.54%, while Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that GLDA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDA.DE | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 6.86% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.20% | 19.87% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.11% | 30.40% | -7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 35.35% | -19.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 32.73% | -16.87% |
Dividends
GLDA.DE vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDA.DE nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDA.DE and AMZN have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GLDA.DE and AMZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer