GLDA.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
GLDA.DE (Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)) and 6AQQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDA.DE is a Gold fund tracking the Gold, while 6AQQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDA.DE returned 18.65%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for 6AQQ.DE. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GLDA.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for 6AQQ.DE.
Performance
GLDA.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a -5.47% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 18.86% return.
GLDA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- -15.18%
- YTD
- -5.47%
- 1Y
- 21.05%
- 3Y*
- 26.12%
- 5Y*
- 18.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.52%
6AQQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 21.85%
- YTD
- 18.86%
- 1Y
- 29.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.06%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- 20.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| €3.29M | €1.96M | €1.62M | |
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | €2.06M | €2.09M | €2.29M |
GLDA.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | -5.47% | 48.99% | 34.24% | 9.40% | 7.00% | 3.88% | 12.92% | 6.37% |
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 18.86% | 7.08% | 33.77% | 51.54% | -29.96% | 39.62% | 34.72% | 11.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDA.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2019 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, GLDA.DE and 6AQQ.DE have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDA.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GLDA.DE
6AQQ.DE
GLDA.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDA.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.31 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 2.98 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | 7.96 | -6.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDA.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.55%, smaller than the maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and 6AQQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDA.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.55% | -31.19% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.55% | -10.01% | -12.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.55% | -26.73% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.55% | -31.19% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.79% | -2.72% | -19.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -5.34% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.74% | 3.75% | +6.99% |
Volatility
GLDA.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) have volatilities of 5.98% and 6.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDA.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 6.23% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 12.94% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.75% | 16.99% | +7.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 20.10% | -3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 19.77% | -3.64% |
GLDA.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLDA.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDA.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDA.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.
GLDA.DE is categorized as Gold, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. GLDA.DE tracks Gold, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDA.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for GLDA.DE and 6AQQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer