Correlation
The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and CNDX.L is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
6AQQ.DE vs. CNDX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L).
6AQQ.DE and CNDX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 6AQQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. CNDX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both 6AQQ.DE and CNDX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 6AQQ.DE or CNDX.L.
Performance
6AQQ.DE vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
6AQQ.DE:
0.08
CNDX.L:
0.41
6AQQ.DE:
0.30
CNDX.L:
0.80
6AQQ.DE:
1.04
CNDX.L:
1.11
6AQQ.DE:
0.09
CNDX.L:
0.48
6AQQ.DE:
0.25
CNDX.L:
1.58
6AQQ.DE:
9.62%
CNDX.L:
6.79%
6AQQ.DE:
23.06%
CNDX.L:
22.05%
6AQQ.DE:
-31.19%
CNDX.L:
-35.17%
6AQQ.DE:
-11.31%
CNDX.L:
-2.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 6AQQ.DE achieves a -7.27% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.L's 1.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with 6AQQ.DE having a 17.32% annualized return and CNDX.L not far ahead at 17.63%.
6AQQ.DE
-7.27%
2.09%
-8.30%
2.43%
20.30%
16.50%
17.32%
CNDX.L
1.98%
3.67%
1.37%
10.30%
23.66%
17.00%
17.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
6AQQ.DE vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
6AQQ.DE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
6AQQ.DE vs. CNDX.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
6AQQ.DE
CNDX.L
6AQQ.DE vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
6AQQ.DE vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 6AQQ.DE nor CNDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.19% |
Drawdowns
6AQQ.DE vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6AQQ.DE and CNDX.L.
Loading data...
Volatility
6AQQ.DE vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...