GLAD vs. FLTR
GLAD (Gladstone Capital Corporation) is a stock, while FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Over the past 10 years, GLAD returned 10.97%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for FLTR. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GLAD vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLAD achieves a -2.63% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GLAD has outperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 10.97%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.51% annualized return.
GLAD
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- -23.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.71%
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 5.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.02M | $34.21M | $28.94M | |
| $3.25M | $3.18M | $3.28M |
GLAD vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAD Gladstone Capital Corporation | -2.63% | -21.14% | 46.99% | 22.71% | -10.43% | 40.50% | -0.69% | 48.58% | -13.07% | 7.05% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.70% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLAD and FLTR is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2011 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLAD vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
GLAD
FLTR
GLAD vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLAD | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 2.95 | -2.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 16.05 | -16.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 94.74 | -95.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLAD vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLAD drawdown since its inception was -74.87%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAD and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLAD | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.87% | -17.84% | -57.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.67% | -0.31% | -35.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.59% | -1.93% | -37.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.59% | -3.06% | -36.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.37% | -17.84% | -40.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.30% | 0.00% | -28.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -0.66% | -18.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.54% | 0.05% | +23.49% |
Volatility
GLAD vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.17%. This indicates that GLAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLAD | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 0.17% | +5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.20% | 0.64% | +18.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.25% | 0.79% | +25.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 2.13% | +21.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.06% | 5.00% | +25.06% |
Dividends
GLAD vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
GLAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.15%, more than FLTR's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.58% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
GLAD Gladstone Capital Corporation | 10.15% | 9.85% | 8.37% | 9.16% | 8.42% | 6.73% | 8.97% | 8.46% | 11.51% | 9.12% | 8.95% | 11.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLAD and FLTR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLAD has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to FLTR (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLAD dropped -74.87% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.37 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLAD and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer