PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GK vs. SURE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GK vs. SURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GK achieves a 17.29% return, which is significantly higher than SURE's 11.70% return.


GK

1D
-0.42%
1M
9.38%
YTD
17.29%
6M
16.22%
1Y
34.45%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
10Y*

SURE

1D
-0.69%
1M
4.65%
YTD
11.70%
6M
13.14%
1Y
25.30%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GK vs. SURE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GK
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
17.29%17.78%20.10%21.19%-42.76%4.95%
SURE
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF
11.70%10.58%12.17%23.30%-11.24%3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GK and SURE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2021

0.71

The correlation between GK and SURE shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GK vs. SURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GK
SURE

Technology

38.9%
26.3%

Communication Services

16.6%
8.6%

Industrials

16.3%
13.6%

Healthcare

7.6%
5.2%

Financial Services

6.1%
13.0%

Utilities

4.5%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
19.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
0.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Energy

-

9.2%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

GK
38.9%
SURE
26.3%

Communication Services

GK
16.6%
SURE
8.6%

Industrials

GK
16.3%
SURE
13.6%

Healthcare

GK
7.6%
SURE
5.2%

Financial Services

GK
6.1%
SURE
13.0%

Utilities

GK
4.5%
SURE
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GK
3.0%
SURE
19.1%

Consumer Defensive

GK
2.4%
SURE
0.8%

Basic Materials

GK

-

SURE
1.0%

Energy

GK

-

SURE
9.2%

Real Estate

GK

-

SURE
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GK vs. SURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GK
GK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SURE
SURE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SURE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SURE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GK vs. SURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GKSUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.58

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.76

13.28

-4.53

GK vs. SURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GK Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the SURE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GK and SURE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GKSUREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.98

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.78

-0.62

Drawdowns

GK vs. SURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than SURE's maximum drawdown of -35.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and SURE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GKSUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.72%

-35.68%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-7.10%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.62%

-21.54%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.69%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-4.84%

-19.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

1.91%

+2.03%

Volatility

GK vs. SURE - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) at 3.79%. This indicates that GK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GKSUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

3.79%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

9.40%

+4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

12.85%

+4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.93%

17.14%

+6.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.93%

17.58%

+6.35%

GK vs. SURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SURE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

GK vs. SURE - Dividend Comparison

GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SURE's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GK
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
0.07%0.08%0.00%0.13%1.30%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SURE
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF
0.91%1.01%0.68%1.11%1.72%1.08%1.28%1.09%1.26%0.65%1.14%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


GK and SURE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GK has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to SURE (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GK dropped -47.72% vs SURE's -35.68%.

On 3-year performance, GK leads with 20.83% vs 17.72% for SURE. On fees, GK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SURE has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GK has performed better with a 20.83% return vs 17.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SURE.

SURE has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.07% for GK.

GK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SURE is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 0.90% for SURE.

GK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GK and SURE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer