GK vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

GK vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GK achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 45.10% return.

GK

• 1D: -2.88%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 13.03%
• 6M: 11.47%
• 1Y: 27.18%
• 3Y*: 18.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: -5.57%
• 1M: 3.81%
• YTD: 45.10%
• 6M: 41.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GK vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	13.03%	3.42%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	45.10%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GK and SGRT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.79

Return for Risk

GK vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GK

GK Risk / Return Rank: 42
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 43

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GK vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GK	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.74	—	—

Drawdowns

GK vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GK	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.72%	-17.87%	-29.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.03%	-5.57%	+1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.77%	-3.22%	-20.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GK	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.71%	35.41%	-16.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.02%	35.41%	-11.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.02%	35.41%	-11.39%

GK vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

GK vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SGRT's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.13%	1.30%	0.04%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GK and SGRT in my portfolio?

GK and SGRT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GK or SGRT?

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GK or SGRT?

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GK or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.07% for GK.

What is the main difference between GK and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 0.59% for SGRT.