GK vs. PSIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) and PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while PSIL is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GK returned 18.34%/yr vs 10.43%/yr for PSIL. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GK charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for PSIL.

Performance

GK vs. PSIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GK achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than PSIL's 25.04% return.

GK

• 1D: -2.88%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 13.03%
• 6M: 11.47%
• 1Y: 27.18%
• 3Y*: 18.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSIL

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 25.04%
• 6M: 21.09%
• 1Y: 76.10%
• 3Y*: 10.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GK vs. PSIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	13.03%	17.78%	20.10%	21.19%	-42.76%	1.96%
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF	25.04%	74.55%	-19.50%	-25.12%	-67.24%	-42.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GK and PSIL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021	0.41

GK vs. PSIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GK	PSIL
Technology	37.9%	-
Industrials	16.9%	-
Communication Services	16.3%	-
Healthcare	8.0%	100.0%
Financial Services	6.9%	-
Utilities	5.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

GK vs. PSIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GK

GK Risk / Return Rank: 42
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 43

PSIL

PSIL Risk / Return Rank: 60
PSIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PSIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
PSIL Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PSIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
PSIL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GK vs. PSIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GK	PSIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.88	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.50	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	3.75	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.74	7.83	-1.09

GK vs. PSIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GK Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the PSIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GK and PSIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GK vs. PSIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, smaller than the maximum PSIL drawdown of -92.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and PSIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GK	PSIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.72%	-92.72%	+45.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	-20.38%	+5.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.62%	-64.62%	+41.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.03%	-75.68%	+71.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.77%	-76.71%	+52.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	9.75%	-5.71%

Volatility

GK vs. PSIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is 8.10%, while AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that GK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GK	PSIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	12.82%	-4.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	28.52%	-13.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.71%	42.43%	-23.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.02%	62.98%	-38.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.02%	62.98%	-38.96%

GK vs. PSIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PSIL's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

GK vs. PSIL - Dividend Comparison

GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than PSIL's 7.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.13%	1.30%	0.04%
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF	7.94%	10.95%	1.49%	0.24%	2.91%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GK and PSIL in my portfolio?

GK and PSIL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GK or PSIL?

PSIL has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to GK (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GK dropped -47.72% vs PSIL's -92.72%.

Which ETF is better, GK or PSIL?

On 3-year performance, GK leads with 18.34% vs 10.43% for PSIL. On fees, GK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GK has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GK or PSIL?

Over the 3-year period, GK has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GK or PSIL?

GK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GK or PSIL?

PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 7.94%, compared with 0.07% for GK.

What is the main difference between GK and PSIL?

GK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PSIL is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 1.00% for PSIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.