GIS vs. PSLV

Last updated Jun 15, 2026

GIS (General Mills, Inc.) is a stock, while PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the No Index (Physical Silver). Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.63%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for PSLV. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GIS vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -23.47% return, which is significantly lower than PSLV's -8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed PSLV with an annualized return of -2.63%, while PSLV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.

GIS

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: 4.61%
• YTD: -23.47%
• 6M: -23.78%
• 1Y: -31.91%
• 3Y*: -21.38%
• 5Y*: -7.83%
• 10Y*: -2.63%

PSLV

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: -12.36%
• YTD: -8.84%
• 6M: 5.69%
• 1Y: 76.87%
• 3Y*: 38.76%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIS vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIS General Mills, Inc.	-23.47%	-23.75%	1.45%	-19.97%	28.09%	18.53%	13.60%	43.13%	-31.57%	-0.65%
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust	-8.84%	145.08%	19.43%	-1.94%	2.74%	-14.13%	42.81%	16.99%	-11.83%	4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GIS and PSLV is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2010	0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap GIS : $18.72B PSLV : $14.73B
EPS GIS : $4.08 PSLV : $13.57
PE Ratio GIS : 8.45 PSLV : 1.71
PEG Ratio GIS : 3.64 PSLV : 0.00
PS Ratio GIS : 1.02 PSLV : 218.98
PB Ratio GIS : 2.00 PSLV : 0.90
Total Revenue (TTM) GIS : $18.37B PSLV : $64.19M
Gross Profit (TTM) GIS : $4.70B PSLV : $404.67M
EBITDA (TTM) GIS : $3.03B PSLV : $8.21B

Return for Risk

GIS vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIS

GIS Risk / Return Rank: 3
GIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
GIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4
GIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
GIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2

PSLV

PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 39
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIS vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIS	PSLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.40	1.30	-2.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.02	1.66	-3.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.27	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	1.72	-2.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.86	3.95	-5.81

GIS vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIS Sharpe Ratio is -1.40, which is lower than the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIS and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIS vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, smaller than the maximum PSLV drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and PSLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIS	PSLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.63%	-79.38%	+19.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.85%	-44.86%	+8.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.32%	-44.86%	-10.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.63%	-44.86%	-14.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.63%	-44.86%	-14.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.70%	-40.70%	-16.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.28%	-58.11%	+47.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.06%	19.49%	-0.43%

Volatility

GIS vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is 6.25%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 16.98%. This indicates that GIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIS	PSLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.25%	16.98%	-10.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.81%	58.26%	-39.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.96%	59.54%	-35.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.14%	35.99%	-14.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.10%	31.33%	-9.23%

Dividends

GIS vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIS General Mills, Inc.	7.07%	5.20%	3.73%	3.47%	2.50%	3.03%	3.37%	3.66%	5.03%	3.27%	3.01%	3.00%
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIS and PSLV in my portfolio?

GIS and PSLV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIS or PSLV?

PSLV has higher volatility (16.98%) compared to GIS (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs PSLV's -79.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.